Pablo Sigal
09/16/2020 - 6:01
Clarín.com
Society
A few days after the
six months
of quarantine, with nuances but uninterrupted, the figures on what has been done so far to face the pandemic show data that, in part, explains why the country has been condemned to
a period of Unparalleled restrictions
: Argentina has become the place in the world with the most coronavirus cases per inhabitant that
has carried out the fewest tests.
In other words, there is no other country that has accumulated
so many infections
and, at the same time, has put
so few resources
at the service of prevention:
swabbing and isolating
.
The scenario changes according to each province, but it is the national average based on official data.
If Argentina did not have more cases and more deaths from coronavirus, it was precisely
because of the eternal quarantine
, which has kept the population confined since March 20 and whose result (low mortality) is a consequence, above all, of the confinement of the
elderly and the most vulnerable people.
Testing little was a political and health decision: where to allocate the scarce resources of the State.
A good part of Argentine spending has served to
expand the availability of intensive care beds and respirators
.
That is, to improve the ability to "tackle" patients, but not the possibility of preventing them from increasing, or from
increasing less
.
The government
delegated this work
to families locked up in their homes and to inactive merchants.
The figures indicate that Argentina has
12,750 cases
of coronavirus per million inhabitants and has carried out
35,388 tests
per million.
If you look at the countries that have had a similar proportion of infections to ours, the differences are eloquent.
v 1.5
Tests and infections
Tap to explore the data
Source:
Worldodometers
Infographic:
Clarín
Spain, which has 12,900 cases of Covid per million inhabitants and
precedes Argentina in ninth place in the world ranking
in absolute number of infections, has carried out 230 thousand tests per million inhabitants.
That is, a volume
six times greater
.
The case of Colombia also allows us to see the contrast in the access to resources destined to an objective that, very early in the pandemic, the WHO had recommended: "Test, test, test."
With
14 thousand cases per million inhabitants
, Colombia has carried out
62 thousand tests
per million.
Peru, with 22 thousand cases per million inhabitants, carried out 107 thousand tests per million.
The
only countries in
the world that had
fewer tests than Argentina
are, in general, marginal territories in terms of the number of inhabitants, or those in which the pandemic has not been a great concern, basically because it has hit them less.
An exception in this scenario is Bolivia, which with almost 11 thousand infections per million (12 percent below Argentina) carried out an average of
only 23 thousand tests
.
The consequence is seen in a result that has not been good: 7,390 deaths for 127 thousand total cases.
What other nations did fewer tests than Argentina?
Bangladesh, but has added just 2,067 cases of coronavirus per million inhabitants;
Pakistan, with 1,364 cases;
The Philippines, with 2,452 cases;
Ecuador, with 6,755 cases;
Guatemala, with 4,570 cases per million;
and Honduras;
with 6,906 cases.
The last two countries, even, so far have
less than 100,000 absolute infections
.
Below that level there are several more examples.
In total, 68 countries carried out fewer tests than Argentina, but none of those that make up that list shows as many infections per million inhabitants as ours.
At the other extreme of this reality are the countries with
fewer cases of coronavirus that carried out the most tests
, and that at the same time did not use quarantine as a practically exclusive and dominant resource against the pandemic.
Germany leads that elite, with 3,159 positives and 160,000 tests per million inhabitants;
Italy had 4,798 cases and 164 thousand tests per million.
Canada, 3,664 cases and 164,000 tests;
France, 6,050 and 153 thousand;
Sweden, 8,638 and 123 thousand.
Testing more
does not necessarily mean fewer infections or deaths
, but it changes the proportions of ingredients that are used to put together the cocktail of potential success or failure.
And that balance for or against, in the end, will not be measured only by
the epidemiological results
of the pandemic, but also by the social, economic and
even health
consequences
(neglect of other diseases) that have determined the choice of each policy .
For this reason, the best grades are not usually seen in countries where the option was
testing or quarantine
, but in those in which a
balance
between both tools
prevailed
.
Great Britain is a good example of the opposite case to Argentina: it has 5,507 cases and 298 thousand tests per million, but
more than 41 thousand deaths
.
There, the initial bet on so-called "herd immunity" as a strategy
cost too expensive.
South Africa is a witness case to show that
the possibility of a balance exists
: so far it has accumulated almost 11 thousand cases per million inhabitants and has carried out 66 thousand tests per million.
That is, 88 percent more resources than Argentina allocated to prevention.
The death rate
is almost the same as in our country
.
However, there the government had to prematurely recalculate the continuity of the confinement, when at the beginning of June (3 and a half months ago) a court declared the unconstitutionality of the unrestricted quarantine.
$