The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Two men in Tuen Mun involved in police "check ID card" stealing 210,000 yuan in cash

2020-01-01T16:26:14.650Z


At about 6 pm on New Year's Day, a police robbery occurred in Tuen Mun. It was reported that two men in plain clothes, facing 25 Jianrong Street, Tuen Mun, suspected to be a 63-year-old man named Huang claimed to be a police officer and asked to see Huang Weng's identity card. In the meantime, Plainclothes Police took the opportunity to snatch Huang Weng's paper bag and fled. The bag contained about 210,000 yuan in cash. Huang Weng


Burst

Written by: Liu Dingan

2020-01-02 00:09

Last updated: 2020-01-02 00:09

At about 6 pm on New Year's Day, a police robbery occurred in Tuen Mun. It was reported that two men in plain clothes, facing 25 Jianrong Street, Tuen Mun, suspected to be a 63-year-old man named Huang claimed to be a police officer and asked to see Huang Weng's identity card.

In the meantime, Plainclothes Police took the opportunity to snatch Huang Weng's paper bag and fled. The bag contained about 210,000 yuan in cash. Huang Weng then reported the case. The real police received the report for investigation. The case was listed as "impersonating a police officer" and "theft." The case was followed up by the criminal investigation team of the Tuen Mun Police District. No arrest has been made.

Police allege that the suspects were two men, one of whom was about 30 years old, about 1.7 meters tall, of strong build, had short black hair, and was wearing a green jacket and blue trousers at the time of the incident; the other was also about 30 years old The man is about 1.7 meters tall and of medium build. He was wearing a black long-sleeved shirt and black trousers at the time of the incident.

Take the risk

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-01-01

Similar news:

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.