Justice Minister acted in the appointment of Dan Eldad to the State Attorney General, and once again made the State Attorney's Office a non-binding recommendation for the law • For Mandelblit and his people, this is a battle not to be lost: Independent State Attorney may reveal the scandals in Netanyahu's files • Interpretation

• Right to left: Attorney Dan Eldad, Minister Amir Ohana, Avihai Mandelblit's Court // Photos: Dudi and Akeni, Hertzi Shapira

Justice Minister Amir Ohana has shown public courage and leadership and has decided to appoint Attorney General Dan Eldad, Director of the State Department of the State Attorney's Office. This is a proper appointment made contrary to the opinion and recommendation of Speaker Avichai Mandelblit, who suggested other candidates.

Section 23A of the Civil Service Law (Appointments) provides that the appointing authority acts as a given officer to the Minister, in consultation with the Civil Service Commissioner. The Commissioner supported the appointment of Attorney Dan Eldad. There is no stipulation in the law that the appointment is required by the court's consent. True, in recent years, judicial activism has become governmental activism, and the impression is being made that robes wear the state instead of elected officials. The Minister of Justice did well to exercise his authority in the law, although it is very likely that the friends of the Supreme Court will file the recognized petitions, which were reinforced by the problematic statement of the Vice President.

Mandelblit's opposition to the appointment is, in my opinion, anchored in an underground tectonic movement that reached the surface. Many citizens are in the process of losing their trust in the law enforcement system. As the facts become clear about the tendency to handle Prime Minister's cases, the public's feelings are reinforced. The conduct of the police, the prosecutor's office, and the USSR in close collaboration with well-known media talkers has broken the trust that has been built up over the years in the law enforcement system. It is clear that the law enforcement system has become a major political player in trying to replace the government, without the need for democratic elections.

The dreadful reality of the loss of trust has caused the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor's Office to move to defense. Shalom will not turn out to have material flaws in their conduct, including the lack of transparency through prohibition orders. The public is entitled to know what and what is hiding? Therefore, they also need an Actor to align with the staff working For several years now, the process of governmental exchange has been completed, and no outsider should be appointed who may reveal, if not more, puzzling moves.

The struggle for the appointment of the State Attorney is only an introduction to the branch activity that the prosecution will conduct to appoint "appropriate" judges in the prime minister's cases. After Shai Nitzan's letter to incumbent judges to receive their support for the prosecutor's office, a campaign will be led to appoint judges who have a good chance of being convicted. It is undoubted that the president of the district court in which the indictment was filed should head the lineup, but is already stirring in the well-known and motivated media in relation to who should judge these cases. The prosecutor's office knows that the prime minister's acquittal, especially from the bribery charge, could shake the state To a path that has no correction.

The PM's portfolio is his "portfolio." Mandelblit // Photo: Mark Israel Salem

The attorney general and the attorney general's office are apparently convinced that the prime minister's files are also their files. In the past, they went out cheaply against public figures who had nothing but an attempt to disqualify them from office. Therefore, it is possible to understand senior jurists who are provided by the prime minister will receive a justice of justice, since the system itself is prosecuted with him.