30 years of the Basic Law│Liang Aishi: Weakness in the concept of citizenship and violent social movement are inevitable tests

Politics

Written by Pan Xiqiao

2020-04-04 11:59

This year is the 30th anniversary of the promulgation of the Basic Law. The former Director of Justice and the current Deputy Director of the Basic Law Committee, Liang Aishi, mentioned in the Hong Kong and Taiwan program "Hong Kong Family Letters" today that the unrest in the past nine months has exposed the public ’s views on the Basic Law. misunderstanding.

She also criticized that the controversy in the Basic Law has increased over the past 30 years, mainly because "some people did not accept the fact of return", constantly changing the space between the lines of the Basic Law, misinterpreting the meaning of the provisions, the purpose is to destroy "one country, two systems" , Hindering the implementation of the Basic Law. She also pointed out that citizens have a weak view of the country. In the process of practicing the Basic Law, violent social movement is an unavoidable test.

Liang Aishi warned that if one country, two systems are to be implemented after 207 years, the public should abandon different political opinions, hatred and hostile attitudes, and strive to learn its spirit and improve its implementation.

Liang Aishi believes that the original legislative purpose of the Basic Law is to safeguard the unity and territorial integrity of the country and implement "one country, two systems" to maintain the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong. She believes that this goal can be generally achieved and is recognized by the outside world. "Except for a few politicians For the purpose of their ulterior motives, whenever Hong Kong is opposed to the central government to discredit China, most citizens agree that "one country, two systems" is the best choice for Hong Kong. This was considered when the Sino-British Joint Declaration was announced. In the Basic Law This is true when it is passed, even today. "

Liang Aishi also mentioned that under the colonial rule of Hong Kong, the citizens had a weak view of the country and did not fully accept the change of identity and recognition of the nation after the return. She believes that Hong Kong ’s political party politics is not mature enough to support executive dominance; it does not have sufficient knowledge of the provisions and meaning of the Basic Law. In addition to familiar with the original various systems, new constitutional provisions, such as the Central and Special Administrative Regions Relationship, the central authority ’s responsibility for Hong Kong affairs, the legal status of Hong Kong, the resistance to the interpretation of the Basic Law, etc., all of which will cause controversy, causing the public to violate the law by “occupying the middle”, “occupying” and violent social movements. Means to express dissatisfaction. She pointed out that some people blamed these problems on the defects of the Basic Law, but she believed that this was not a problem of the Basic Law, but an inevitable test in practice.

[30 years of the Basic Law] People ’s Daily: No tolerance for any challenge to the “one country, two systems” bottom line

[Thirty Years of the Basic Law] Tian Feilong: The "historical turning point" of Hong Kong universal suffrage is difficult to reproduce

[30 years of the Basic Law] Li Zhuming approves of universal suffrage: "One country, two systems, one second has not been implemented"

She believes that the unrest in the past nine months has exposed the public's misunderstanding of the Basic Law. She criticized that the controversy over the Basic Law in the past 30 years has continued unabated, mainly because of the fact that "some people have not accepted the return at all, constantly turning the lines between the words of the Basic Law, misinterpreting the meaning of their provisions, misleading the public, and aiming. It is to destroy "one country, two systems" and hinder the implementation of the Basic Law. "

This year is the 30th anniversary of the promulgation of the Basic Law.

At the end of her article, she pointed out that if you want "one country, two systems" to run smoothly, and even continue after 2047, the public should abandon different political opinions, hatred and hostility, and strive to learn the spirit of the Basic Law and improve its implementation, otherwise the Basic Law will remain It will continue to exist, but to what extent the future of Hong Kong will be reduced, it is "imaginable."

My Home My District My Home New Pneumonia