The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

[Hong Kong version of the National Security Law] "People's Daily" issued a document: an important measure to maintain "one country, two systems"

2020-05-21T16:47:40.655Z


On May 21, the third session of the 13th National People's Congress held a preparatory meeting. According to the agenda of the meeting approved by vote, this meeting will consider and pass the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law." "People's Daily" later commented late at night, saying that


Instant China

Written by: Xu Qi'an

2020-05-22 00:34

Date of last update: 2020-05-22 00:37

On May 21, the third session of the 13th National People's Congress held a preparatory meeting. According to the agenda of the meeting approved by vote, this meeting will consider and pass the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law." "People's Daily" later published a comment late at night, calling it "an important measure for maintaining national security" and "a fundamental strategy for maintaining" one country, two systems. "

The full text is as follows:

On May 21st, the third session of the 13th National People's Congress held a preparatory meeting. According to the agenda approved by the vote, this meeting will consider and approve Decision. This is an important measure for safeguarding national security and a fundamental strategy for safeguarding "one country, two systems."

There is no doubt that Hong Kong has become a prominent risk point for national security. This risk comes from the increasingly rampant activities of the "Hong Kong Independence" organization and the local radical separation forces, from the social, economic, and political speculation of the opposition's bottomless line, from the escalation of violent terrorist activities, from the nakedness of external forces Local interference in Hong Kong's affairs comes from the combination of "Taiwan independence" and "Hong Kong independence" forces ... All of these all seriously challenge the bottom line of the principle of "one country, two systems", and all cause serious harm to national sovereignty and security. If we are tolerant of this, the "one country, two systems" orbit will be destroyed, and the interests and well-being of the general public in Hong Kong will be at risk.

This is not alarmist. Nowadays, anyone can see the "Sima Zhao's heart" against the anti-China chaotic Hong Kong forces. When Li Zhiying, the boss of Apple Daily, publicly clamored for "fighting for the United States" and voluntarily became the pawn and vanguard of the external forces of the United States and the West to split the country and subvert the state power; when the opposition military division Dai Yaoting preached "Ten Steps" Trying to force the central government to declare Hong Kong into a state of emergency so that Western countries can "impose political and economic sanctions on the Chinese Communist Party"; when Chen Fang Ansheng and others traveled thousands of miles to "report to the outside world", they sought protection from Western anti-China forces , Seeking resources, asking for instructions ... Their purpose is not only to "disorder the port", but also to "anti-China", seriously endangering national security. It can be said that collusion between internal and external anti-China chaotic Hong Kong forces is currently the biggest danger facing Hong Kong and the biggest enemy of "one country, two systems."

It should be noted that the first proposal of "one country, two systems" is to achieve and maintain national unity, and maintaining national security is the core essence of "one country, two systems." In the "Rituals", the anti-China chaos of Hong Kong blatantly advocated "Hong Kong independence", "Recovering Hong Kong, the revolution of the times", "Self-determination" and "referendum" to carry out activities that undermine national unity and split the country; flagrantly insult and burn the national flag and deface The National Emblem and the Regional Emblem of the Special Administrative Region have impacted the central garrison institutions in Hong Kong, and even clamored for "armed nation-building" and "square constitution". Which one is not deliberately endangering national security and undermining "one country, two systems"? For a long time, the opposition has deliberately opposed the maintenance of national security and the protection of citizens ’rights and freedoms. The intentional legislation to stigmatize and demonize Article 23 of the Basic Law is to allow Hong Kong to" undefend "in terms of national security so that they can wreak havoc. "One country, two systems."

Wang Zhenmin: Establishing and Perfecting Hong Kong's Safeguarding the National Security and Rule of Law

【Two sessions in 2020】 The agenda of the National People's Congress announces the fifth item in the "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law"

[Xia Luo New Bureau] "Hong Kong version of the National Security Law" is on the verge of Hong Kong's next "decade"

[Hong Kong version of the National Security Law] The castle game in the sky is a complete loser

【Hong Kong Version National Security Law】 China-US confrontation intensifies Hong Kong's national security issue

We must face up to the fact that Hong Kong is now one of the least sound legal systems and enforcement mechanisms for safeguarding national security worldwide, and one of the weakest systems for maintaining national security. The reason why "Hong Kong independence", "black violence", and "sponsoring speculation" is intensifying, and the fundamental reason for the unbridled division, subversion, penetration, and destruction lies here. It can be said that the legal loopholes in national security will not be filled in a day, and the challenges facing "one country, two systems" will become omnipresent.

National security legislation belongs to the central authority. In the case where the national security of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is threatened and seriously damaged, and the government of the Special Administrative Region cannot complete the legislation on its own, the central government takes the initiative to carry out relevant legislation at the national level. It is precisely to fill in the loopholes in national security and put the risk of derailment "One country, two systems" is back on track, putting a seat belt on the implementation of "one country, two systems." The central government took the initiative to fill the legal loopholes and build dams for "one country, two systems." This is both a last resort and a place of power and responsibility.

National security is guaranteed, and Hong Kong's development is better. Establishing and improving the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region ’s legal system and enforcement mechanism from the national level is the central government ’s greatest and ultimate responsibility for safeguarding national security and the greatest concern for the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong and the well-being of Hong Kong compatriots. We have enough sincerity and confidence to ensure that the principle of "one country, two systems" will not change and not be shaken. At the same time, we also have sufficient determination and ability to ensure that the practice of "one country, two systems" will not be deformed or deformed.

Hong Kong version of the National Security Law Conference of the National People's Congress 2020

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-05-21

You may like

News/Politics 2024-01-30T03:38:38.978Z
News/Politics 2024-03-07T08:05:51.578Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.