The sergeant involved in cheating the school police in the 240,000 case. The defendant asked everyone to pay 1,000 to buy a gift and finally got a flashlight.

Social News

Written by: Li Huina

2020-06-03 18:42

The case of the police school sergeant involved in cheating the school police for 240,000 cases was resumed today (3rd). The finance minister of the case continued to give evidence. He said that when the training course was nearing the end, the defendant asked each school police to pay 1,000 yuan in order to buy gifts For the most contributive students and every student in the class, the sheriff also arranged a lottery. Gifts include mobile phones, sun phones and pillows, also known as everyone’s share. As a result, he picked a phone, but it was second-hand. Not only was the protective sticker ripped off, but there were photos on the phone. He had even seen the sheriff used the same phone. The gift that every student gets is a flashlight.

SS Class Finance Ma Baoquan said that he won the mobile phone at the end of the draw, but it is a second-hand goods. (Profile picture)

The defendant, Ou Zhiwei (39 years old), was charged with two deceptive means to obtain property, one public official acceptance benefit, and one public official misconduct.

Lottery gifts include mobile phone sunglasses and pillows

At that time, Ma Baoquan, who served as the treasurer in the SS class, continued to give evidence today. Ma pointed out that the defendant said to the class members at the end of the training course that they wanted to purchase gifts for the class members and the most contributors in the class. Yuan was used to buy gifts. At that time, no one in the class objected. The defendant said that he would buy mobile phones, sunglasses, and pillows for the most contributing class members. As for the gift that everyone will have, it is a flashlight.

There are photos in the phone

The defendant arranged a lottery afterwards. Ma said that he won the mobile phone, but the phone was a second mobile phone. When he opened the phone, he found that there were photos in it, and the protective stickers had been torn apart. He also said that he had seen the defendant used the same money. phone.

Ma Yishu said that during the training, the defendant had told the SS class member that he had received an anonymous complaint that he overcharged the class fee, and the defendant instructed the class member accordingly. Meal expenses. The head teacher later asked him and another finance minister about the class fees and asked them to rewrite their financial records.

Witnesses claimed that the defendant Ou Zhiwei (pictured) had produced multiple documents, and they were "taking out a report". (Profile picture)

The defendant took out the documents to help the classmates recall the expenses

Ma said that after the class teacher made an inquiry, he reported the matter to the defendant. The defendant then produced multiple handwritten documents, saying that he would "help them recall the content of the expenditure" and instructed him and another finance minister to "report a report." The defendant gave the documents to them and recalled them. They did not attach the documents to the report.

Ma admitted under cross-examination that the head teacher had written the class members to record the exam questions and wrote back the relevant questions. He knew that some class members did the same, but he did not. The defense pointed out that the defendants instructed the class members from time to time to tell them to "stay away from three friends: beg X, judge X, and don't do X". Ma admitted that he had heard the talk.

The sheriff was involved in the police school when she was involved in tricks to withdraw money from the class fee and cheated 30 school police officers for more than 240,000 yuan.

The sheriff was involved in cheating the class fee of 240,000. The pre-school police said that each person needs to grab 6,000 yuan to buy a hand iron camcorder.

Sheriff of the Police Academy was involved in defrauding 30 academic police officers of RMB 250,000

The defense questioned that the confession was not presented

The defense also pointed out that Ma's confession in March 2017 did not mention the defendant's request for gifts from the trainees. Ma explained that he was taking advantage of the empty lunch confession at work, and he did not remember the incident in a hurry. The defense pointed to Ma in 2017, "a lot of people don't remember", and Ma Yin said this after discussing the incident with the other class members in the WhatsApp group, Ma denied.

Case number: DCCC816/3019

Police officer committing a crime