Social News
Written by: Zheng Qiuling
2020-07-07 16:59
Date of last update: 2020-07-07 16:59Liang Jichang, a member of the Legislative Council of the accounting profession, proposed the "Public Investigation (Public Order 2019) Bill" to set up an investigation committee with statutory power to fully investigate the anti-amendment incident last year. Ou Zhiguang, deputy director of the Security Bureau, stated that the government objected because it would affect government operations, public expenditure and government policies, and did not meet the requirements of the Basic Law.
Liang Jichang, a member of the Legislative Council of the accounting profession, proposed the "Public Investigation (Public Order 2019) Bill" to set up an investigation committee with statutory power to fully investigate the anti-amendment incident last year. (Profile picture)
The Legislative Council Panel on Security Affairs met today (7th). Member of the accounting profession, Leung Ji Cheong, proposed the Public Investigation (Public Order 2019) Bill, which is based on the Board of Inquiry Ordinance. It is recommended that all evidence provided in front of the Committee should have absolute privileges. Witnesses are not required to be legally responsible in any litigation or other civil proceedings because of such evidence to encourage participants, journalists or police officers to make factual statements.
Ye Jianyuan, the education sector, believed that "the use of a policeman to deal with a purely political issue was not the best way." If the government responded to public opinion early to set up an independent investigation committee, "the whole society needs to develop to the present." He believes that The revision incident continued due to factors such as public dissatisfaction with the government and the police’s indiscriminate arrest. He hoped that after the change of the Legislative Council in October, he would continue to promote the draft.
The Federation of Trade Unions Lu Songxiong believes that some people behind the social movement continue to provoke and undermine the rule of law. It is unstoppable. It mentions that the "Spark Alliance Support" raised a huge amount of money. If I raise money and how to use it, "I really want to know." He also mentioned that under the Sino-U.S. trade war, politicians went to the United States to lobby and questioned "whether they received orders to mess up Hong Kong."
Ou Zhiguang, deputy director of the Security Bureau, stated that the government opposed the position, saying that the draft would affect government operations, public expenditure and government policies, and did not meet the requirements of the Basic Law. He used the independent investigation of the Shazhong Center as an example to spend 92 million yuan. The past rulings of the Legislative Council President would cause a considerable increase or decrease in public expenditure and should not be passed. In addition, he pointed out that the content mentioned in the draft has been dealt with in a special report.
Pan Xi, Senior Counsel for Judicial Review of Police Officer Number Case: Guidance on the "General Police Regulations" has been suspended
The First Anniversary of the Revising Law｜Zhang Chaoxiong: Hong Kong is in the most unstable state
One-year anniversary of the revision of the law｜History scholar Liu Zhipeng commented on the text of the text: the two reservations should be returned
First Anniversary of the Revised Regulations｜Yellow and Blue Camp Has Published Nearly 20 Public Libraries and Three Books Will Be Available
The First Anniversary of the Revised Laws|Social Interpretation of the Police Force's Coloring of Political Institutions
Anti-revision routine demonstration independent investigation committee Legislative Council Security Bureau