The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

"Ta Kung Pao" bombards the Judiciary's Arrogant Lawyers Association: not accepting criticism based solely on political opinions

2020-09-22T11:59:11.864Z


"Ta Kung Pao" published a social review yesterday (21st), entitled "The Judiciary Cannot Be an "Independent Kingdom"", criticizing the Judiciary for its arrogance for its "judicial independence" attitude in a thousand characters. The article named Magistrates Lin Ziqin and He Junyao. It was "Judge Huang" who made "absurd judgments" and described that the judiciary is not subject to public scrutiny. It is an "independent kingdom that is impenetrable and impenetrable." The Law Society of Hong Kong issued a statement today (22nd) to rebut, emphasizing Unfair and unfounded criticisms based purely on political opinions are unacceptable. They strongly condemn all attempts to undermine the dignity and independence of the judiciary, and point out that for parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment, the appropriate way is to The ruling was appealed.


Political situation

Author: Zheng Rongdi

2020-09-22 19:43

Last update date: 2020-09-22 19:43

"Ta Kung Pao" published a social review yesterday (21st), entitled "The Judiciary Cannot Be an "Independent Kingdom"", criticizing the Judiciary for its arrogance for its "judicial independence" attitude in a thousand characters. The article named Magistrates Lin Ziqin and He Junyao. It was "Judge Huang" who made "absurd judgments" and described that the judiciary is not subject to public scrutiny. It is an "independent kingdom that is impenetrable and impenetrable."

The Law Society of Hong Kong issued a statement today (22nd) to rebut, emphasizing that unfair and unfounded comments (criticism) based solely on political opinions are unacceptable.

It strongly condemns all attempts to undermine the dignity and independence of the judiciary, and points out that for parties who are dissatisfied with the judgment, the appropriate way is to appeal the ruling.

"Ta Kung Pao" published a social review entitled "The Judiciary Cannot Be an "Independent Kingdom"", criticizing the Judiciary in a thousand words.

The Law Society of Hong Kong reiterated that the work of the courts is to make decisions on legal issues and facts in specific cases in a fair and impartial manner regardless of the nature of the incident and the parties.

It also means that if the court has already made a ruling on a legal issue at the first instance, the appropriate way for the party who is dissatisfied with the ruling is to appeal the ruling.

The Law Society also pointed out that no one should publish or make speech or conduct that would undermine or be deemed to undermine the judicial independence and rule of law in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, reiterating that judicial independence and the rule of law are the foundation of the common law system of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

The Law Society of Hong Kong strives to uphold the rule of law and strongly condemns all attempts to undermine judicial dignity and independence.

"Ta Kung Pao" recently bombarded the situation of "police pulling people and judicial release" in a social review titled "Judicial Institutions Cannot Become an "Independent Kingdom"". It also accused the judiciary of being arrogant by virtue of its "judicial independence" attitude, "not to Public opinion takes it seriously."

In the social review, the magistrates Lin Ziqin and He Junyao were named as "Judge Huang" and made "absurd judgments." It is described in the article that the source of all judicial chaos lies in the supremacy of the judiciary and is not subject to public supervision. "All complaints against judges are handled by the chief judge at the same level. It is inevitable to "check one's own person" and conflicts of interest. , Believes that the Hong Kong judiciary is accused of "an independent kingdom that is impenetrable and impenetrable". "Is it just prejudice?"

Hong Kong Government: Shi Juemin's resignation as a non-permanent judge of the final court did not mention the reason for the Chief Executive to deal with the established practice

The establishment has repeatedly criticized "police pulling people and judges to let people go." Liang Junyan disagrees: all judgments are fair

Ho Junyao's transfer | Judiciary: Allegations that judges have political positions and empty transfers have nothing to do with complaints

Judiciary Ta Kung Pao The Law Society of Hong Kong

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-09-22

You may like

News/Politics 2024-02-15T11:51:35.762Z
News/Politics 2024-02-14T17:21:13.028Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-03-28T06:04:53.137Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.