The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Ye Jianyuan approved not to mention Britain not subject to anonymous complaints. Teacher Liang Zhenying: Can a name be made public for a named complaint?

2020-10-18T11:04:12.417Z


Liang Zhenying, the vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and former chief executive, has recently been attacking the education sector, requesting the disclosure of the information of teachers who were found to be professionally unethical, and the integration of the information of 18 teachers in court on social networks, which was criticized by the Education Association as "Cultural Revolution criticism." When Liang Zhenying attended a commercial TV program today (18th), he countered that the Education Association was "ignorant of history," and gave an example of handling complaints against teachers in the United Kingdom. Once the complaint is established and a case is filed for investigation, teacher information will be disclosed. Ye Jianyuan, a member of the Education Legislative Council, later posted a rebuttal on Facebook, saying that Leung Chun-ying cited the British TRA example, but never mentioned that the British system never accepts anonymous complaints, and has a fair hearing system. He criticized Leung Chun-ying for "only magnifying it deliberately and doing a lot." The article rationalizes his despicable way of attacking teachers at will. This is of course a manifestation of hypocrisy.” Liang Zhenying quickly countered and questioned Ye Jianyuan’s statement, “Does it mean that if the person complaining to the teacher makes a name-based complaint, the name of the teacher complained about Can it be made public?"


Political situation

Written by: Luo Jiaqing

2020-10-18 18:51

Last update date: 2020-10-18 18:51

Liang Zhenying, the vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and former chief executive, has recently been attacking the education sector, requesting the disclosure of the information of teachers who were found to be professionally unethical, and the integration of the information of 18 teachers in court on social networks, which was criticized by the Education Association as "Cultural Revolution criticism."

When Liang Zhenying attended a commercial TV program today (18th), he countered that the Education Association was "ignorant of history," and gave an example of handling complaints against teachers in the United Kingdom. Once the complaint is established and a case is filed for investigation, teacher information will be disclosed.

Ye Jianyuan, a member of the Education Legislative Council, later posted a rebuttal on Facebook, saying that Leung Chun-ying cited the British TRA example, but never mentioned that the British system never accepts anonymous complaints, and has a fair hearing system. He criticized Leung Chun-ying for "only magnifying it deliberately and doing a lot." Articles to rationalize his despicable way of attacking teachers at will. This is of course also a manifestation of hypocrisy."

Liang Zhenying quickly issued a counterattack, questioning Ye Jianyuan's statement, "Does it mean that if the person complaining to the teacher makes a name, the name of the teacher who is complained about can be made public?"

Ye Jianyuan pointed out that if Liang Zhenying wants to investigate the reasons why young people are dissatisfied with the government, he should support the establishment of an independent investigation committee.

(Profile Picture/Zheng Zifeng)

Ye Jianyuan said in a post that Liang Zhenying questioned teachers this morning as the source of the radicalization of youth, so teachers need to be investigated. However, Ye Jianyuan believes that the core reason for the radicalization of youth is that the Lam Cheng government’s administration ignores public opinion and "is the police abusing power and violence." To investigate the reasons why young people are dissatisfied with the government, Liang Zhenying should support the establishment of an independent investigation committee. "Liang Zhenying pretends that he can't see the core of the problem, and then unnecessarily and selectively attacks teachers. This is just his hypocrisy."

Liang Zhenying immediately posted a counterattack on Facebook, referring to Ye Jianyuan’s statement, “Does it mean that if the person who complains about a teacher makes a name and makes a complaint, the name of the teacher who is complained about can be made public? Does it mean that because the government does not have an independent investigation committee, there is no need to Investigate the failure of teachers? Haha."

Liang Zhenying questioned teachers as the source of radical youth

Leung Chun-ying said on a radio program this morning that there have been sensational incidents in Hong Kong in the past year. Even the French yellow vest movement and the U.S. counter-warning demonstrations have not appeared like Hong Kong. There are as many as 1,000 teenagers and students, and more than 100. In the case of teachers being arrested, teenagers have been radicalized to attack police officers, participate in illegal acts, and even riots. Therefore, problems must arise in education. It is necessary to investigate where the students are "infected."

He believes that teachers are also "emergency contacts" in this regard. "Of course, it can be said that it is through social media or the media, but is the school a direction? Is the teacher the source? We have to investigate this matter."

Open teacher information like the Cultural Revolution?

Liang Zhenying rebukes the Association of Education for ignorance and questioning teachers as the source of radical youth

Liang Zhenying: Hong Kong being replaced is a negative view, but the road to success in Shenzhen needs to be studied

Liang Zhenying FB lists the accused teacher's data and Ye Jianyuan criticizes madness: study whether it violates the "Privacy Ordinance"

Liang Zhenying Ye Jianyuan

Source: hk1

All news articles on 2020-10-18

You may like

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T09:29:37.790Z
News/Politics 2024-04-18T11:17:37.535Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.