A limit was crossed in abjection with the despicable murder of this exemplary history teacher who, far from wanting to provoke his students, was only doing his job, in fact his duty, by inviting them with tact and kindness to think , from a real case that had to be shown, at the limits (or not) of freedom of expression.
This atrocious event, which upsets the country, but which, no doubt, also delights the fanatics Islamists who, unfortunately, reside there, calls for a series of remarks both in form and in substance.
To read also:
Radical Islamism: "Ending the omerta"
First on the vocabulary.
The notion of "separatism", which perhaps had some relevance in the past, is now completely inadequate to qualify what we are experiencing and which must be designated by fair terms, because it is indeed a matter of course. concerted policy of spreading terror, not acts of secession, which we are dealing with.
After what happened in Conflans, what professor, if he is still not supported by his hierarchy, will still dare, even if only to evoke the cartoons of Mohammed in a course on freedom of? expression?
Let's say it more clearly: after what happened in Conflans, what professor,
This article is for subscribers only.
You have 78% left to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
Enter your email
Already subscribed?
Log in