The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Almost D'Alessio: the Mar del Plata Chamber prosecutor requested the dismissal of Carlos Stornelli

2020-10-26T17:56:52.517Z


Juan Carlos Pettigiani maintained that most of the facts handed down by the judge to the Buenos Aires prosecutor "did not constitute a crime." Now the court of appeals of that city must decide.


10/26/2020 2:50 PM

  • Clarín.com

  • Politics

Updated 10/26/2020 2:50 PM

The prosecutor of the Federal Chamber of Mar del Plata, Juan Manuel Pettigiani, maintained on Tuesday that

most of the facts by the judges

did not constitute crimes

, the federal judge and member of "Legitimate Justice" Alejo Ramos Padilla prosecuted the prosecutor Carlos Stornelli as a member of an illicit association dedicated to illegal espionage and extortion and

requested its total dismissal

.

In the D'Alessio case, Pettigani

harshly criticized Ramos Padilla

for his

impartiality and lack of legal criteria

in the case opened after a Forum Shopping maneuver in the framework of Operation Puf.

In a brief submitted to that court of appeals in Mar del Plata, he argued that the events named by Ramos Padilla as cases

"Brusa Dovat-PDVSA", "Iran Terrorismo", "Munin Talevi", "Castañon", "Ubeira "

And that

no participation of Stornelli in the alleged" parastatal "illicit association could be proven,

as well as in the attempt to extort Pedro Etchebest and the one referred to as" GNL "against the false" retired agricultural producer ".

Pettigiani took this position at the consulate on the partial elevation of the case to trial formulated by the federal prosecutor of Dolores, Juan Pablo Curi.

In a well-founded 168-page opinion, the prosecutor

requested that Stornelli's prosecution be reversed

.

And he requested the reservation of the federal case (art. 14 law 48) for the eventual case of a decision contrary to the interests of this Public Prosecutor's Office by the Federal Chamber of Mar del Plata, which must now give its opinion.

The ruling begins by analyzing the threat of the use of police force made by Judge Ramos Padilla so that the false lawyer Marcelo D'Alessio gave him access to his cell phone and others his computers and asked if the constitutional rights of the accused were not violated. He has been in prison for almost two years.

"The truth, so allegedly sought in the present, is built

with the impartiality of the judge

, the participation of the parties (the majority former officials and businessmen K), the publicity of the evidence for all of them and, especially, the control bodies of such delicate activity, "added the chamber prosecutor.

After analyzing the “evidence” of the judge in the case, Pettigiani stated that “beyond the degree of accomplishment of each one,

none of the 31 events listed on page 6546 was verified in the jurisdiction of Dolores

, as it has repeatedly indicated, with serious arguments, the Federal Prosecutor of Dolores, to which I refer ”.

News in development

Source: clarin

All news articles on 2020-10-26

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.