The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Schengen: the right and the National Rally regret the lost time

2020-11-06T19:44:35.683Z


The opposition notes the semantic evolution of Emmanuel Macron on terrorism and immigration."So we lost ten years." On Twitter, Thursday, LR president of the Senate Economic Affairs Committee, Sophie Primas, summed up the state of mind on the right. While Emmanuel Macron had just announced his desire to “ fundamentally ” overhaul the rules of the Schengen area and to achieve “greater control” of the borders “due to the intensification of the terrorist threat”, Les Republicans reacted str


"So we lost ten years."

On Twitter, Thursday, LR president of the Senate Economic Affairs Committee, Sophie Primas, summed up the state of mind on the right.

While Emmanuel Macron had just announced his desire to

fundamentally

overhaul

the rules of the Schengen area and to achieve

“greater control”

of the borders

“due to the intensification of the terrorist threat”,

Les Republicans reacted strongly, regretting that they had not been heard earlier.

Read also:

Immigration, borders, terrorism: what Macron has in mind

As early as 2012, Nicolas Sarkozy had made these two subjects one of the main axes of his presidential campaign before resuming them during the 2016 primary

(read below)

.

In recent years, his proposals had finally won over the Republicans who demanded their implementation.

Thursday morning, the LR mayor of Nice Christian Estosi yet offered in

Nice-Matin

to

"suspend for a while the Schengen agreements"

.

A response after the Nice attack last week.

This article is for subscribers only.

You have 75% left to discover.

Subscribe: 1 € the first month

Can be canceled at any time

Enter your email

Already subscribed?

Log in

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2020-11-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.