The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Dispute in the AfD: Alexander Gauland criticizes Jörg Meuthen's speech as "not worthy of a chairman"

2020-12-06T23:55:03.374Z


After the federal party congress, the pressure on AfD leader Jörg Meuthen increased - because he criticized the party's right wing wing too harshly. Alexander Gauland sees it as "a steep draft for the protection of the constitution."


Icon: enlarge

Alexander Gauland in Braunschweig

Photo: Moritz Frankenberg / dpa

The AfD leadership continues to argue about the speech by party leader Jörg Meuthen at the federal party conference last weekend.

"The tone, timing and content of this speech were not worthy of a chairman," said the chairman of the parliamentary group, Alexander Gauland, on Saturday in Braunschweig.

"It would have been his job to bring the party together, not to throw off parts."

Meuthen had given a fiery speech against the ethnic part of the party in Kalkar.

In it, among other things, he sharply criticized the rhetoric of some AfD colleagues: "We will no longer achieve success by appearing more and more aggressive, more and more coarse, more and more uninhibited." A heated debate ensued about the party leader.

In the SPIEGEL, the völkisch wing asked Meuthen to revive the content.

Rarely has a speech had such an impact, said Gauland at an AfD meeting to draw up a state list for the federal election.

"Nobody talks about our pension concept, it simply doesn't interest." Gauland also spoke of a "steep bill" for the protection of the constitution.

He does not assume that Meuthen wanted this.

"But he should have thought about it longer."

Meuthen had spoken of "provocateurs" in their own ranks and warned the party to be disciplined before the election year 2021.

Icon: The mirror

vet / dpa

Source: spiegel

All news articles on 2020-12-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.