With lawyer Richard Malka, it is the intensity of the verb that arose in the courtroom, Friday, during the trial of the January 2015 attacks, while the lawyers of
Charlie Hebdo
gave their pleadings.
What the lawyer for the legal entity of the newspaper
Charlie Hebdo
told the magistrates
is that it is not only a question, for the specially composed Assize Court, of
"judging the accused in the face of victims but also principles that they wanted to bury by these crimes, because these crimes are not like the others.
We must take into account their symbolic dimension.
Your backyard has that freedom.
That of writing it in the reasons for its decision, because nothing prevents it in the penal code ”
.
Richard Malka will speak little of the accused, if not to reproach them with
“a crime of indifference and passive indulgence, they who knew Amedy Coulibaly so well”
.
Read also:
Trial of the January 2015 attacks: anti-Semitism at the heart of the pleadings
More passionately will he prefer to return to this freedom of expression,
"one of the most precious"
, he recalls, citing the Declaration
This article is for subscribers only.
You still have 74% to discover.
Subscribe: 1 € the first month
Can be canceled at any time
I ENJOY IT
Already subscribed?
Log in
