The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

File 2000: Discussion of Netanyahu's Attorneys' Claims Israel today

2020-12-07T22:22:59.005Z


| SentenceThe Prime Minister demands that the 2000 case be closed on the grounds of improper proceedings • The State Attorney's Office claims: "The investigation was conducted in a decent and routine manner" • The defendants will not appear in court Prime Minister Netanyahu in an earlier hearing at his trial Another hearing will be held today (Sunday) in the 2,000 case as part of the indictment filed aga


The Prime Minister demands that the 2000 case be closed on the grounds of improper proceedings • The State Attorney's Office claims: "The investigation was conducted in a decent and routine manner" • The defendants will not appear in court

  • Prime Minister Netanyahu in an earlier hearing at his trial

Another hearing will be held today (Sunday) in the 2,000 case as part of the indictment filed against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The hearing, which will take place in the Jerusalem District Court and will deal with the preliminary allegations of Netanyahu, Shaul and Iris Elowitz and Noni Mozes, who demand that the indictment against them be dismissed because, according to them, there were material defects.

The prosecution opposes their request and claims that there was no defect in the indictments.

Among other things, Netanyahu claimed that the waiver of immunity was made illegally and therefore null and void.

The prosecution emphasized that Netanyahu himself withdrew the request for immunity, and in this way the indictment can actually be filed.

They added that it is not clear why Netanyahu is raising this claim now, close to a year since she announced that he was giving up his immunity.

Netanyahu files: Court hearing on the issue of disclosure of evidence // Photo: Yoni Rickner

The prosecution also rejected his claim that the offenses attributed to him in the 2000 case were committed as part of his job.

"The defendant's acts constituted a 'gliding' from the obligated by virtue of his parliamentary role towards the 'forbidden'," it read.

"This is a detailed and planned discourse around Mr. Moses' bribe offer and Mr. Netanyahu's desire to use it for personal gain."

Netanyahu claimed that investigative moves and improper pressure were exerted on state witnesses in order for them to sign an agreement.

The prosecution replied that "after hearing the evidence, the factual picture reflecting the truth will become clear to the court. This is in contrast to the skewed and distorted picture now presented by defendant 1 (Netanyahu), while trending the following pieces of evidence to ostensibly establish a narrative of a lost investigation ... the investigation as a whole. It was conducted in a decent and routine manner, in an effort to find out the truth. "

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2020-12-07

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.