The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

25,000 deaths in Gaza: why the destruction of this war exceeds that of other major conflicts

2024-01-21T15:06:20.459Z

Highlights: 25,105 people have died in Gaza since last October 7, according to health authorities. More than one in every 100 Gazans has died in the 105 days of conflict. Five out of every 10 deaths are minors, three out ofEvery 10 are women. Israel appears to be applying what is known as the Dahiya Doctrine, writes Peter Bergen. Israel's attacks have also focused on the north of the Strip, he says. Bergen: There is no way to distinguish between Hamas militiamen and civilians.


Eight out of every 10 deaths in the Strip since last October 7 are women or children


The health authorities of Gaza, under the control of Hamas, have raised this Sunday to 25,105 the death toll from Israel's attacks on the Strip since last October 7.

Five out of every 10 deaths are minors, three out of every 10 are women and two out of every 10 are men aged 18 or over.

To this figure must be added 62,681 wounded since the beginning of the bombings.

The figure implies that more than one in every 100 Gazans has died in the 105 days of conflict.

That amount, just over 1% of the population, would be the equivalent of about 70,000 people in a city like Madrid.

It is difficult to find similar numbers in other recent conflicts.

The available data, compiled by the United Nations in the academic project

Cost of War

, indicate that more people are dying per day than in Iraq (even in the worst month of fighting in that country), in Syria or in the first month of war in Ukraine.

Those conflicts lasted longer (the first invasion of Iraq, eight years) and resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

The one in Gaza is at the beginning and with no signs of an end in the near future.

This rhythm is what causes the death toll in Gaza to reach 10,000 after the first month of attacks.

In Ukraine it took a year and a half to reach that number (including civilians only).

The following graph shows how the deaths evolved in each conflict until the third month of war.

These numbers are explained, in part, because the magnitude of Israel's attack is unprecedented.

There have never been as many bombings with civilian casualties in the Middle East conflicts as those recorded in October and November on Gaza and the West Bank: 1,614, almost all of them in the Strip, according to data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project ( ACLED, for its acronym in English).

Israel appears to be applying what is known as

the Dahiya Doctrine

.

It is named after a stronghold of the Hezbollah militia in the south of Beirut that Israel bombed intensively after the kidnapping of two of its soldiers that started the 2006 war. Gadi Eizenkot, the then chief of staff who is now a member of the Cabinet of war, he explained it two years later as “using disproportionate force and causing immense damage and destruction” by considering any location from which shots are fired at Israel as “military bases.”

In the background is the idea that this tough strategy will lead the population to rebel against Hamas.

A direct consequence of these bombings is the destruction in Gaza.

Around half of the buildings in the Strip have been damaged or destroyed, a figure that rises to between 72% and 84% in the north of the Palestinian enclave, according to an analysis based on images from the Copernicus Sentinel-1 satellite.

There were also not as many attacks and deaths in previous conflicts between Gaza and Israel.

The figures recorded this year multiply by 10 the highest levels of previous years.

Since reliable data became available (2008), only in 2014 had there been more than 2,000 deaths in the Strip and the West Bank (and it was over the course of a year).

At the start of the war, military spokesman Daniel Hagari admitted that the “emphasis” of bombing was on damage, not precision.

US intelligence services estimate that about half of the munitions Israel has dropped from the air are unguided.

Another difference with previous conflicts lies in the use of artificial intelligence.

The previous chief of the General Staff, Aviv Kojavi, pointed out last year that the new data system generates 100 potential targets daily, when before there were 50 in a year.

No safe zones

Among those killed in the Strip, there is no way to distinguish between Hamas militiamen and civilians, but their death toll has been contrasted and verified in several international scientific studies (such as this one from

The Lancet

)

.

Furthermore, the very high percentage of women and children, who are unlikely to be militiamen, beaten by the Israeli attack, stands out.

The figures are partly explained by the demographics of Gaza, where one in two people is a minor: it is sadly logical that in an indiscriminate bombing one in two deaths would be a child.

Israel's attacks have also not focused only on the north of the Strip, where, at first, the army said it wanted to eradicate the presence of Hamas.

25% of the victims have been in Rafah and Khan Younis, two towns south of the Wadi Gaza River, where Israeli forces urged the civilian population to take refuge in the first month of the war.

The authorities of the Strip, who are publishing a list with the names, surnames and ID of the deceased, also estimate that there are about 7,000 people under the rubble.

The situation also does not allow us to estimate deaths due to lack of medical care (more than 62,000 injuries have been recorded), hunger (most aspire to one meal a day) or illnesses caused by sleeping in tents in the coldest months.

Follow all the international information on

Facebook

and

X

, or in

our weekly newsletter

.

Subscribe to continue reading

Read without limits

Keep reading

I am already a subscriber

_

Source: elparis

All news articles on 2024-01-21

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.