The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

A CGT official sentenced to suspended sentence for “apology of terrorism” after the distribution of a leaflet on the October 7 attack

2024-04-18T21:03:12.039Z

Highlights: Jean-Paul Delescaut, general secretary of the CGT Departmental Union of the North, sentenced to one year's imprisonment with a simple suspended sentence for advocating terrorism. The court considered that the comments in question demonized the perpetrators of the attacks, encouraged. "lessening moral reprobation" against them, and created an inversion between victims and perpetrators of terrorist acts, the court said. The court emphasized that the leaflet contained "no explicit or implicit condemnation of the actions of October 7." The majority of anti-Semitic acts committed in France "relate to a displacement of this conflict on the (national) territory, the court added.


“The horrors of the illegal occupation have piled up. Since October 7, they have received the responses they provoked,” we could read on the leaflet published under the responsibility of Jean-Paul Delescaut, general secretary of the CGT Departmental Union of the North.


The Lille criminal court on Thursday sentenced a CGT official to a one-year suspended prison sentence for “apology of terrorism” via comments made in a leaflet supporting the Palestinians, a conviction which he appealed. The court sentenced the general secretary of the CGT Departmental Union of the North, Jean-Paul Delescaut, to one year's imprisonment with a simple suspended sentence for advocating terrorism, but on the other hand acquitted him of acts of public provocation to hatred or violence.

The trade unionist was prosecuted for a leaflet distributed by the union on October 10, three days after the Hamas attack on Israel.

“The horrors of the illegal occupation have piled up. Since Saturday (October 7, Editor's note) they have received the responses they provoked

,” we could read in particular. This tract, written collectively, was published under the responsibility of Delescaut. The court considered that the comments in question demonized the perpetrators of the attacks, encouraged

“lessening moral reprobation”

against them and created an inversion between victims and perpetrators of terrorist acts. The court also emphasized that the leaflet contained

“no explicit or implicit condemnation of the actions of October 7.

” While believing that it did not contain any

“real exhortation to hatred or violence”

, he pointed out that these remarks could have

“concrete consequences”

in France, where the majority of anti-Semitic acts committed

“relate to a displacement of this conflict on the (national) territory

.

Delescaut was absent for the deliberations and his lawyers did not wish to comment, only indicating that their client was appealing.

“It is a very bad signal which is given in terms of freedom of expression on this conflict which is tensing, to put it euphemistically, the political-media world”

, on the other hand estimated the LFI deputy Ugo Bernalicis, who is returned to court.

During the hearing on March 28, the prosecutor estimated that the leaflet

“constituted legitimization of a mass attack under the cover of a historical analysis”

. The general secretary of the CGT Sophie Binet and the leader of LFI Jean-Luc Mélenchon came to lend their support to Delescaut. The CGT du Nord had argued in a press release that

“explaining is not justifying”

and denounced

“a very violent attack against trade unionism”

.

Source: lefigaro

All news articles on 2024-04-18

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.