The verdict is in.
The appeal filed against the total closure for 15 days of bars and restaurants in the metropolis of Aix-Marseille, was rejected Wednesday by the administrative court of Marseille.
However, this decree aimed at curbing the spread of Covid-19 in these only two cities in mainland France is not to everyone's taste, far from it.
"
It is an inappropriate decision, unilateral, brutal, without preparation, which leads to a feeling of rebellion and revolt,"
denounced the president of the Paca region, Renaud Muselier, at "Talk-
Le Figaro" on
Wednesday.
"
We can see that there is a feeling of revolt because of injustice and incomprehension
", he insists.
Read also:
Covid-19: is France one of the countries most affected by the resumption of the epidemic?
At the heart of the health and economic crisis, Muselier wants to dot the i's.
Because if he does not so much dispute the principle of closing establishments in view of the health risks, he denounces the ways of the government in terms of consultation and concertation.
“
It would have been acceptable to everyone if we had started a discussion with local elected officials,
” he insists.
Anxious to dissociate himself from a call for civil disobedience and to calm tensions, the former minister wanted to do things in due form: "
when you challenge the rule, you have to do it within the rules
", he stressed.
This would have been acceptable to everyone if we had started a discussion with local elected officials.
Renaud Muselier
Aware of the health risks in his capacity as a doctor, "
it is above all necessary to punish bad students
", assures Renaud Muselier, stressing in passing that the perpetrators "
are not even controlled
" and that the police prefect "
has not engaged the mechanical administrative closures
”.
"Far from the field"
In general, the head of Regions of France welcomes the involvement of all in the management of the health crisis "
without controversy
" and the close collaboration of the government on the economic side.
On the other hand, he severely judges the Scientific Council: "
which spoke constantly in the press, before the politicians who have to make decisions
".
Not forgetting “
part one
” of the crisis: “
after having explained to us that we should not mask, not test, we just had to isolate and in any case never treat
”, “
I believe that the decisions that 'they take are not hit on the corner in common sense and are far from the field,
"he concludes.
