• Business

• Opinions

MK Kellner and Qari, you no longer need to turn off the light. You did it

Members of the Knesset who rejected the bill against economic violence leveled arguments at a very low level, not knowing what appeals reach the courts every day.

The only impression created by their dark thoughts is that someone took down the shelter and turned off the light in this country.

opinion

Tags

• Shlomo Krai

• violence

Adv. Ruth Dayan Wolfner

Wednesday, October 21, 2020, 4:24 PM

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments

• Thousands of women march against Trump: "Vote for ...

• Steamery Fabric Razor

• Dozens demonstrated outside Minister Gila Gamliel's home and read ...

• Students fight to reduce tuition following ...

• Cinema projector

• USA: Apple, Google, Amazon and Facebook were questioned in Congress about ...

• Edelstein: We will consider denying budgets to an educational institution ...

• The self-employed: We lost confidence in the government, did not obey the closure instructions ...

• Quik company video

• The last line: Trump embarks on a journey in the swinging countries ...

In the video: Stormy discussion in the Constitution Committee on the Prevention of Economic Violence (Photo: Knesset Channel)

Economic violence is no less dangerous than physical violence.

It leaves no marks, it is often hidden from view and takes time to locate.

Sometimes it starts small.

They quarreled and he cut off her credit card, but returned the next day along with a bouquet of flowers.

Sometimes it grows over the years and becomes real terrorism.

MK Ariel Kellner and his Likud friends oppose the bill to prevent economic violence, among other things on the grounds that "perhaps he imposed economic terror on her when he did not let her buy clothes for NIS 10?"

Or maybe she terrified him when she bought clothes for 10,000 shekels and impoverished him, and he can not go to a football game? "

This opposition seems to stem from a basic lack of understanding of what economic violence is. Just as physical violence is not justified as punishment for misconduct, so is violence Financially can not be justified.In other words, for MK Kellner, if she bought clothes for ten thousand and he can not go to a football game it is allowed to cancel her credit card, deny her access to the bank account or impose on her another financial sanction.

What if he does not resort to economic violence but punches or stabs her?

This is forbidden by law and there is no debate about that.

Prevention of physical violence is not considered a "legalization" of the family, aliba Dahach Shlomo Karai, but prevention of economic violence is illegitimate.

Violence is violence and many faces. Economic violence is no less dangerous than physical violence, among other things because it creates dependence, turns the The family cell to a prison and allows abuse without the ability to escape.

More on Walla!

NEWS

A bite of life: dumplings stuffed with corned beef in a crispy coating

Ines Shilat Yanai in collaboration with Tov Chicken

To the full article

There is no proper way to refer to a sentence like "Maybe she terrified him when she bought clothes for 10,000 shekels and impoverished him, and he can not go to a football game?"

Ariel Kellner (Photo: Reuven Castro)

Adv. Ruth Dayan Wolfner (Photo: Inbal Marmari)

Indeed, men also experience financial abuse but still the bulk of the victims are women.

Some are wealthy women under the law, who are held captive within a family cell without access to the sources of capital that also belong to them, without the ability to make economic decisions, and under economic terrorism.

And terrorism like terrorism has no rules or rules of morality. If she does not agree to sleep with him, her credit card may be cut off and she may not have money to buy food, or one day she will receive a message from the bank that she has no ability to perform any joint account. The electricity in the house because he decided to punish her.

And when she is so weak financially it is easiest to use verbal violence on her, tell her she is zero and worth nothing, or threaten her that if there is no sex tonight there will be no credit card, or just give her a slap because she spoke badly, and all when she has nowhere to run or how to finance Legal proceedings.

how convenient.

These are not theoretical cases, but cases that come daily to the doorstep of the Family Court.

And when a bill may give the court more tools to deal with violence and economic terrorism, and MKs oppose it and want to "bury her in a grave burial" it seems that sometime someone took down the shelter and turned off the light in this country.

• Share on Facebook

• Share on WhatsApp

• Share on general

• Share on general

• Share on Twitter

• Share on Email

0 comments