The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Whoever orders a kitchen cannot return - ECJ on the right of withdrawal

2020-10-21T12:18:51.235Z


Whoever buys a personalized kitchen cannot revoke this. The European Court of Justice decided that. A kitchen manufacturer had sued a customer.


Icon: enlarge

The ECJ ruling is about a custom-made kitchen

Photo: HighwayStarz / imago images / ingimage

Anyone who buys goods on the Internet, on the phone or at the front door or concludes contracts there can usually reverse this.

The so-called revocation makes it possible: Consumers usually have 14 days to do this.

But what is the situation like when a company manufactures goods specially tailored to the customer?

This case has now been decided before the European Court of Justice (ECJ).

The result: In such cases, the right of withdrawal does not apply within 14 days - even if the company has not yet started production.

The kitchen company hadn't started work yet

Specifically, it was about a fitted kitchen that a customer had bought at a trade fair.

Some parts of the kitchen should be specially customized.

The furniture company planned to hire another company to manufacture these parts and then install them themselves for the customer.

The service provider had not yet started when the buyer revoked the contract.

He refused to take down the kitchen and the furniture company took it to court.

The Potsdam District Court asked the ECJ whether this exception to the right of withdrawal also existed if the company had not yet built the parts.

The Tribunal has now affirmed this.

If goods or contracts are sold in a shop, the statutory right of withdrawal does not apply anyway.

It is still unclear whether the contract for the fitted kitchen was even signed outside of business premises.

According to the ECJ, a trade fair stand could definitely be viewed as business space - if the contract was not concluded directly at the stand, however, it would not be business space.

The Potsdam court must now clarify what applies in the specific case.

Ref. C-529/19

Icon: The mirror

caw / hej / dpa / AFP

Source: spiegel

All business articles on 2020-10-21

You may like

News/Politics 2024-02-29T12:24:26.392Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.