The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

The 10 keys that explain the increase in poverty

2021-04-03T14:07:39.524Z


Jobs were lost, and the salaries of those who have jobs lose against the rise in prices. Ismael Bermudez 04/03/2021 10:44 Clarín.com Economy Updated 04/03/2021 10:44 The increase in poverty - from 25.5% (11.3 million) to 42% (19 million) in the last three years - stands out due to the magnitude and speed of its growth . Its sources are multiple in the midst of a persistent fall in economic activity -15.1% in 3 years-, a greater deterioration in employment and a soaring inflation, e


Ismael Bermudez

04/03/2021 10:44

  • Clarín.com

  • Economy

Updated 04/03/2021 10:44

The increase in poverty - from 25.5% (11.3 million) to 42% (19 million) in the last three years - stands out due to the

magnitude and speed of its growth

.

Its sources are multiple in the midst of a persistent

fall in

economic

activity

-15.1% in 3 years-, a greater deterioration in employment and a soaring inflation, especially in the prices of the basic food basket.

Official figures and indicators show a more than critical outlook.

It ranges from the fall of employed people, the increase in unemployment, the increase in jobs of few hours or in changas, the

real decline in wages and pensions

, the skyrocketing cost of basic baskets, the greater social inequality, job insecurity,

the increase in people and families assisted by the State

and the decline and

shrinkage of the middle class.

The pandemic and quarantine added “more fuel” to poverty, accentuating a process of economic, social and labor deterioration that has lasted for several decades, which

peaked between 2000 and 2002

with the exhaustion and subsequent collapse of the convertibility system and which hit

another shock as of 2018.

All this happened in a context with more people and families assisted by the State -

the IFE reached 9 million people

, the AUH includes 4.4 million girls and boys - aid that is not enough, which did not prevent both the indigence and poverty grew with each INDEC measurement.

The data that make up this jump from poverty are:

1. Loss of jobs

With an increase in the population (from 44 million to 45.4 million), the INDEC indices show that

the level of employment fell

from 43% of the population at the end of 2017 to 40.1% at the end of 2020. They represent a level country

a loss of more than 700,000 jobs.

2. More changas

Among the employed

grew people with jobs of few hours, changas

, the vast majority unregistered or informal.

In three years, underemployment went from 10.2% to 13.1% in 2019 to jump to

15% in 2020

.

Those 4.8 points more represent an increase of 1,100,000 people.

3. Less private employment

Registered private sector workers decreased

from 6,296,264 to 5,818,600: 478,600 fewer formal jobs.

4. More unemployment

Unemployment rose from 7.2% to 8.9% during 2018 and 2019

to rise again to 11% in 2020

.

It increased from 1,400,000 to 2,300,000 unemployed.

5. Wages that lose to inflation

Salaries, pensions and social benefits lost between 15% and 28% compared to inflation

, while the fall was greater in relation to the poverty line or basket.

In three years, inflation was 209%, the basic food basket 241%, and the INDEC wage index barely 143%.

6. Children looking for work

Faced with this loss of income, and to bring another income closer to the families,

the daughters and sons went out to look for work with uncertain and adverse results.

Consequently, unemployment among younger people increased.

Thus, while unemployment is 11%, among women aged 14 to 29 it rises to 26%, 3.4 times the rate of adult women.

In the case of young men (14 to 29 years old), the rate reached 19%, representing 2.9 times the rate for older men.

7. Poor poorer

The poor are poorer.

In just three years, the distance or gap between the income of individuals and families to reach the value of the basic food basket increased from 35.5% to 41.9%.

"In this way, not only was there an increase in the incidence of poverty, but

the situation of people under the Poverty line worsened

due to the greater distance between their income and the Total Basic Basket" according to the latest INDEC report.

8. Child poverty

Poverty "did not respect" ages, but it was cruel to the youngest.

Among those under 14 years of age, poverty jumped from 39.7% to 57.7%: it increased from 4,300,000 to 6,300,000.

Almost 6 out of 10 girls and boys live in poor households. 

9. More people looking for work

Added to the job search by the unemployed were a portion of the employed themselves dissatisfied with the job they have because they are part-time, informal jobs, without social protection (“without retirement contributions”) or because their income is low, they do not correspond to their qualification and need additional income.

The pressure of the demand for work rose in three years from 27.2% of the workforce to 37.3%.

10. Multidimensional poverty

If instead of the income of individuals or families, we take into account people who live in a precarious way, in overcrowding, with problems of school attendance, precarious employment or access to health,

poverty rises to 47 % of the population or 21 million people

.

These data are official from the first semester of 2020, from the Social Programs Information, Evaluation and Monitoring System (SIEMPRO), an agency that depends on the Presidency of the Nation.

It corresponds to the measurement of Multidimensional Poverty, which complements the traditional measurement of poverty by income from INDEC.

NE

Look also

57% of boys are poor: figures show that four times more is invested in older adults than in children

Wages lose more than 6% against inflation in one year

Real poverty and the distorting mirrors of politics

More of the same in the new poverty data

Source: clarin

All business articles on 2021-04-03

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.