The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Discrimination against Baiden: The Supreme Court disqualifies a key part of the vaccination campaign Israel today

2022-01-13T22:04:54.613Z


The Conservative majority in the Supreme Court ruled that the administration has no authority to use occupational safety regulations to impose a vaccination obligation on private sector workers and rejected the provision requiring large companies to vaccinate their employees • According to experts Were avoided. 


President Joe Biden's efforts to use the federal government to eradicate the corona plague came as a shock on Thursday when the Supreme Court overturned a ruling it issued requiring private sector workers to be vaccinated if they are in large offices (companies of over 100 people) or checked frequently. 

All six Conservative justices of the Supreme Court have ruled that the federal government has no authority to force workers to get vaccinated, not even in emergencies like an epidemic.

They noted that the provision deviates from the legal area entrusted to the relevant Occupational Health Agency (OSHA), which believes in regulation of work and health in the workplace.

In doing so, the Supreme Court effectively exempted 80 million Americans in the private sector from the obligation to be vaccinated or frequently screened, and experts estimate that if the order had been fully implemented at least 6,500 people would have survived and 250,000 hospitalizations would have been avoided. 

"The OSHA body has never imposed such an obligation, nor has Congress," the judges noted in their decision.

"Although Congress has enacted significant laws regarding the epidemic, it has not enacted any legislation similar to the OSHA directive," they went on to say, in effect telling the administration that the only way it can issue such a directive is to get a green light from the legislature. This extensive right of enforcement. 

The three liberal judges, on the other hand, argued in the minority opinion that the Supreme Court should not interfere with the professional judgment of the administration in this area. 

Biden said in response to the decision that he was "disappointed that the Supreme Court decided to prevent the application of common sense by requirements that would have saved the lives of employees in big business, as these are decisions that are well grounded in both law and science."

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us

Source: israelhayom

All news articles on 2022-01-13

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-05T10:26:08.268Z

Trends 24h

News/Politics 2024-04-18T20:25:41.926Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.