David Rosen waited and waited for an opportunity to fall into his lap to help his longtime friend Avihai Mandelblit, the Attorney General. Recall that Deputy Attorney General Mandelblit was among the members of the Detection Committee that chose Rosen for the long-awaited role. Lots of luxury and money without work.

Like Commissioner Rosen, in which the actions of Shai Nitzan and Attorney General Mendelblit cleaned up and downplayed the actions of Brigadier General Hirsch's candidacy for senior police forces by the law enforcement system, Rosen similarly acted in the closure of his criminal case over his long-time friend Mendelblit.

The question that is asked is whether Rosen's examination came to examine and criticize the conduct of Mandelblit in the case or did she come to legalization? Why did he choose to enter the campaign at this time? These questions raise more concern that this is a test whose outcome was known in advance and whose sole purpose is to clean and train Mandelblit's status. It would not be unreasonable to claim that this was an examination that the Attorney General welcomed opening and there was no fear of its conclusions.

In a situation where trust in the Attorney General is at an unprecedented low, getting approval for his statement from an apparently objective body of criticism that did not fail in his conduct in the Ashkenazi-Mandelblit case, is equally important to him, especially when there are those who seek to form a parliamentary review committee. So unfortunately, Justice Rosen has not yet begun his examination - its results, it seems, are known in advance.

Rosen elegantly paused, without explanation, on two issues he was asked to examine. The first, Mandelblit's baseless attacks on Deputy State Attorney Dan Eldad, after he began an investigation into the closure of the criminal case and expressing opposition to extending the latter's term.

The second, a connection between Mandelblit and the brothers Joshua and Shlomo Lamberger, makes it clear why Mandelblit was acting for Lamberger's appointment as Deputy State's Attorney. These issues do not pertain to Mandelblit's tenure in the military and therefore no explanation for ignoring these claims.

Rosen is actually examining an issue that was not asked at all by the applicant, but was haphazardly addressed in order to be asked whether he could give his friend Mandelblit final protection he needed during these difficult days.

Despite his long-standing friendship and serious conflicts of interest, Rosen - in his own mind and in light of the "necessity of the hour" as his definition, decided that he was not well acquainted with Nylon Mandelblit to serve as a stumbling block against the complaint. So simple. Any other public person would face criminal prosecution for this decision.

In addition, Rosen was not ashamed to have a meeting on June 23, 2020 with Mendelblit, his old friend. Public confidence is skyrocketing to the players from this meeting of friends.

Rosen finished the reply letter distributed to the media in words that would have been appropriate to close the case in the absence of guilt. Lack of guilt. The two words Rosen sought to give to the Attorney General.

Rosen finds out that Mandelblit was sitting with counsel Weinstein in his request to change the cause of the criminal case in his case, although he was represented by lawyers, and contrary to the rule that a prosecutor does not sit with the suspect personally. This is not the case, either, before the plaintiff has completed the case to make her opinion and recommendations.

The meeting chaired by Attorney General Nitzan and Attorney General Mandelblit, after taking up his post as Attorney General in light of Attorney Chen, allegedly constitutes a breach of trust. Senior law enforcement officials are discussing the request itself, and only after discussing the matter are being recalled to discuss the preliminary question whether it is appropriate and appropriate to discuss the case of counsel Mandelblit, head of the law enforcement system, in charge of it.

You have decided that it is inappropriate to sit down and discuss in light of the heavy conflict of interest in this matter, it cannot be cleared after they have sat and discussed and leaked their conclusion, a conclusion equivalent to the garlic peel in light of the serious conflict of interest in which they were present.

Rosen preferred to focus on the "necessity of the hour" doctrine to clear his friend Mandelblit.

Mandelblit's criminal case is still open to the police criminal record and the attorney general's decision to close the case on grounds of lack of evidence, rather than a lack of arbitrary and existing guilt.

Mandelblit must lay the keys, and one hour before.