The Iranian president warns Israel against a military strike. What exactly he means by this is a mystery.
Iran knows better about its weapons arsenal than many of its long-term politicians. Although a nuclear weapon cannot be ruled out, this option appears extremely unlikely. The Iranian government is interested in self-preservation despite the attack on Israel. And the use of nuclear weapons would probably also be the end of the Iranian state. The threat of an escalation of the spiral of violence in the war in Israel is a serious concern for the international community. But the Iranian leadership is also divided. Some emphasize a de-escalation of the situation, others insist on a counterattack. Which scenarios are realistic and which weapons could be used - is there a threat of a spiral of violence in the War in Israel? The threat is clear. What is behind the words? The threatening gestures from Iran have been steadily increasing since Tehran's attack on the Israeli state.