The range of ideas that Milei exposes is curious and broad. Syncretic ideological discourse involves heterodox combinations.
Milei invokes these ideological labels with ease, and he also does so with the elements with which he fills the boxes, with emphasis, without paying attention to inconsistencies, contradictions or tensions. If cohesion is sought, it will not be here; if Milei is a populist, she is not on this level. An example of the features of his ideological discourse is the newly gained centrality of the Malvinas cause. The trigger was supposedly the veterans' displeasure at the mentions made in a tribute to the media and state terrorism. It is understandable that the former combatants were upset with a story that they felt left them like media puppets, writes Javier Milei. He says the President let us know his intention to modify “by decision of the national government” the education law to “criminalize indoctrination in schools.” It is neither Republican nor liberal to prevent a teacher from criticizing anyone for their alleged conduct during 1982, he says.