The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Hamburg police defend action against blockade at the Climate Academy

2019-09-21T14:04:34.580Z


Have policemen on the sidelines of the Climate Demo in Hamburg acted extremely hard against demonstrating minors? Against this criticism, the authority now defends - and in turn accuses.



Focus on climate crisis

All articles | More information

Reporting on climate change is one of the major journalistic challenges of our time. The climate crisis is also one of the most important issues of humanity for SPIEGEL. For this reason, we support an international initiative that seeks to take a look this week: "Covering Climate Now" has been initiated by the Columbia Journalism Review and the Canadian newspaper "The Nation", with more than 200 media companies worldwide including the Guardian, El País, La Repubblica, The Times of India, Bloomberg or Vanity Fair. SPIEGEL is dedicating the cover story of the current issue to the climate crisis this week and every day pays special attention to mirror.de

The police in Hamburg has defended themselves against criticism of their actions against a sitting blockade following the climate demonstration. In social media, officials were accused of disproportionate violence against children, including through so-called pain grips.

Police said "a significant number of complaints". Authorities spokesman Timo Zill dismissed these allegations: Operatives had brought some demonstrators off the lane using simple physical force after they failed to respond to several calls and threats of immediate coercion, a statement said on Twitter.

"The task forces have enforced this to the required extent, calmly, deliberately and professionally," says Zill. The officials used among other things the so-called back grab handle. On the road blockade, he said, "Too bad that a few are trying to use this peaceful protest for their own purposes."

Blockade Lombardsbrücke is viciously evacuated. #staying #limission pic.twitter.com/r17tWzJ7qW

- Remain seated! (@Sitzenbleibenhh) September 20, 2019

For example, in a video distributed on Twitter, police near the centrally located Lombarts Bridge take a young man in a special grip, turn his head to the side and carry him away.

Another video shows one policeman holding on to a protester while another apparently uses painful grips on her hand.

Really bad pain grips! @PoliceiHamburg, does that have to be ?! #Police violence #Climate #Climbing pic.twitter.com/nh3JjZo6FM

- Remain seated! (@Sitzenbleibenhh) September 20, 2019

"To tackle a climate-related sit-down so brutally is really the last," tweeted Emily Laquer of the "protectionist" interventionist left. Other users wrote that many participants were minors. "Are pain in children used?", It said in a comment.

The alliance called "Sit down!", A coalition of the groups "Ende Gelände Hamburg", the "Interventionist Left" and other initiatives called for a sit-down. According to the police, around 70,000 people had peacefully taken to the streets for climate protection during the demonstration of "Fridays for Future".

More about the climate crisis

OverviewAnswers to the ten most important questions about climate change

In many countries, millions of people around the world had to protest for more climate protection on Friday - while Chancellor Angela Merkel presented the planned measures of the government after tough negotiations.

The "Fridays for Future" movement, which was mainly supported by students and students, was supported for the first time on a grand scale by other organizations and initiatives. These include the trade unions Verdi and IG Metall, the Protestant church as well as child protection, environmental and aid organizations, artists as well as parents and grandparents' networks.

Source: spiegel

All life articles on 2019-09-21

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-10T04:31:13.697Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.