Election in Austria: back in the 18th century

guest Post

"To keep the care, the private forces, against the forces of the state in a subordinate degree". Thus is the third chapter in Joseph von Sonnenfels State Theory "Principles of the Police" overwritten. That was in 1776 and on behalf of Maria Theresa. If one or the other reads this chapter today, he has the election program of the ÖVP in front of him.

All measures to limit the citizen by police control and censorship are now presented once mainly to the asylum laws. But the work of the FPÖ in the turquoise-blue coalition has shown that the "security" of Austrian society as a whole is meant. And as in the case of Sonnenfels: It's about the peuplication. Here, too, the FPÖ has to name what is actually meant. Autochthony. In the dilemma between German-national as identity and Austrian state as territory an Austrian autochthones is claimed. So then an Austrian can be a whole "German" man. And let's never forget that Jörg Haider felt like the more intact and real "German" because he never apologized for the Holocaust.

There never was a nationalism of the Austrian. Zisleithanien was always identified with the house Habsburg itself. This has been expressed in Catholicism. The Austrofascism was then the open appearance, which demanded from Sonnenfels restriction of the citizen into the rule of the state. Well without an emperor. But deep in the culture of the Catholic. The German nationalist men laughed at the Austrofascists as effeminate papists.

The administration of the citizen

Today. The ÖVP joined in this inheritance and got the German-national FPÖ-guys to take over the Aggressive in politics and leaves the FPÖ the identity. So Austrian autochthony. For this purpose, three generations must have been born in Austria and the autochthonous citizenship is secured. The Nuremberg race laws also count from the grandparents. Now, once. Autochthonia ensures access to all social achievements. The FPÖ party program provides for the autochthonous woman to pay her for the birth of autochthonous children and their education for six years. Thus the "Umvolkung" should be banned by migration. Non-autochthons should be managed separately. Because that's the point. The administration of the citizen.

So it's about autochthonous children. At the same time, the masculinity of a nationalist as a male identity is supposed to bring together the autochthonous men. For this, again, the family image of the 19th Century is endeavored, in which the householder ruled over wife and children.

Recently. A German journalist asked why Austrian women so often stayed at home with their children, did not work for more than 20 hours and were satisfied with 48 percent of the pension. The answer to this is that the woman is recognized as a woman only if she lives this negative social catalog and claims to be happy with it.

An ÖVP woman then goes to church and educates the children to Catholicism. An FPÖ woman is proud to have a man. These Austrian women always increase the men in it. They allow a natural privilege of the man. Every man. And he would still be so reformed. In any case, he is a natural winner in this policy of cultural deprivation of women. And the women were already attested in the government program of the turquoise-blue coalition their difference from the men. The dignity of women in this program was dependent on such diversity. Equal rights. Equality.

The anticipatory obedience of the subject

As provided for in the Austrian Constitution. The principle of equality. It no longer applies and the gap between state and culture becomes apparent. The historical development has turned Austria into a conservative welfare state. With the departure of the principle of equality now once in the gender issue, all possibilities open up to undermine the democratic. Asylum legislation has long since left the foundations of human rights. The point now is to declare diversity in general by referring to the shift of women to a different category. And then to keep them "in a subordinate degree".

Both parties of the former turquoise-blue coalition are concerned with this "symmetry". It is about the dream of the totally governed subject who immediately stifles every revolutionary inclination. Voluntary and anticipatory. This was already imagined in the 18th century.

At that time, the Catholic Church took over the work of finishing. In this election campaign, the ÖVP and FPÖ can rely on the inherited fears and allegiances of the Austrians very well. Ms. actress Christiane Hörbiger has said so aptly for everyone in her video message. She wants to be "picked up." She wants to see "our dear little" Austria taken from Kurz in the hand. A child finding is suggested there. The orphan comes into good hands. The abandoned child saved.

Price query time:
06.06.2019, 13:31 clock
No guarantee

DISPLAY

Marlene Streeruwitz
Flames wall .: novel with notes.

Publishing company:

S. FISCHER

Pages:

416

Price:

EUR 22,00

Buy from Amazon Buy from Thalia

Product information is purely editorial and independent. The so-called affiliate links above, we usually receive a commission from the dealer when buying. More information here.

The metaphor of Austria as the orphan was introduced after the death of Emperor Franz Joseph. No democratic self-confidence has dissolved this metaphor. The Austrian waits for rescue in melancholy hopelessness. The ÖVP forms from lewd sentences such as "One who remains on the ground" or "A new beginning must be" the nose ring, which will lead the Austrian back to its subordinate. The FPÖ expresses schoolyard threats: "Without FPÖ tips Shortly to the left!" and paints the reactionary Schauer picture of the revolution. The Social Democracy hopes that "humanity will win" and will go out empty-handed. Humanity. That would have to seek human rights. Nobody understands here.

No Austrian shouted when the turquoise-blue coalition proposed to draw up its own catalog of fundamental rights. And the Austrians were once again not invited. No one has to do that anymore in the post-democratic essential gender definitions. But we've probably always been there. In the post-democratic even before there was democracy.

As I write this. In Innsbruck. There are 20,000 people passing by. Fridays for Future. Another zeitgeist. And certainly not melancholy. The enthusiasm to be there. Perhaps it is this negative image of the destroyed world that forces people on the street into a self-determined idea of ​​themselves. These are people of all ages who want to take their future into their own hands and do not want to be left alone. Now. It will show how it goes on. With the "subordinate dimensions". And according to the "principles of the police".