The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

“Pure fantasy”: Is this Bavarian cheese Germany's worst customer deception?

2020-09-08T15:46:17.672Z


Every now and then advertising leads astray, that is a well-known fact. In an online vote, however, a large Bavarian cheese manufacturer has now won a negative price.


Every now and then advertising leads astray, that is a well-known fact.

In an online vote, however, a large Bavarian cheese manufacturer has now won a negative price.

Heimenkirch / Berlin - That was probably really cheese: The consumer organization Foodwatch is awarding its “golden windbag” prize this year to a

cheese made by Hochland

.

For consumers, the

cheese of the Grünländer brand was

 the

“most brazen advertising lie of the year”

among five nominees in the online vote

, as

Foodwatch announced

on Tuesday.

Manufacturer Hochland did not accept the negative price and again rejected the criticism of its product.

In the past few years, foods intended for children had often "won" the award: Among other things, an organic tomato sauce from the eco-brand Zwergenwiese and a "baby biscuit" from the manufacturer Alete.

Coca-Cola

got its fat off in 2018 - for a "Smartwater".

Cheese from Bavaria "wins" negative price from Foodwatch: Hochland because of advertising in criticism

The

consumer

advocates nominated the cheese this year because Hochland advertised "milk from free range cows" on the packaging, with the animals moving around in the barn.

“'Free range cows' is a

pure fantasy term,

” criticized Foodwatch.

"Hochland leads its customers into a pasture idyll and deceives those consumers of all people who consciously choose products from which they expect better animal husbandry."

Hochland refused a conversation today and did not want to accept the golden #windbag.

Weak!

We would have liked to discuss the brazen animal husbandry deception with the "Grünländer" cheese.

https://t.co/hFSFSBtMkC pic.twitter.com/qloaQJg3lJ

- foodwatch Germany (@foodwatch_de) September 8, 2020

"For our brand we only use milk from cows that can move freely around the barn at any time and are not tied up," explained Hochland.

The company rejected the criticism on Tuesday as "not appropriate" and did not accept the inglorious award.

According to Foodwatch, the

company headquarters in Heimenkirch, Bavaria

(Lindau district) was locked during the planned handover and “the group management was not available for a discussion”.

Cheese manufacturer Hochland outraged after minus price: Transparent information?

Customers obviously see it differently

Already after the

nomination in mid-August

, Hochland had declared that the back of the packaging would clearly indicate “that the term 'free range cows' refers to cows kept in the barn”.

Nothing else is suggested on any advertising material.

"In our TV commercial, too, we clearly show the cows in a closed barn."

For many of the 65,000 consumers who voted online for the golden cream puff, that was apparently not enough: According to the consumer advocates, almost 44 percent chose Grünländer cheese.

A

Volvic organic tea from Danone

received around 18 percent of the vote, followed by a

meadow milk from Arla

(14 percent), a

fruit spread from Zentis

(13 percent) and a

protein bar from Mars

(12 percent).

According to

Foodwatch, the

"tea" from Volvic contains

around

half a teaspoon of tea per 750 milliliters

.

At Arlas Weidemilch, the organization saw customers being duped with an invented CO2 label: This promises

71 percent savings in greenhouse gas

, but only relates to the

manufacture of the packaging

.

Mars, on the other hand, promised a “plant-based protein kick” with its product, even though the

bar consists of around half of fat and sugar

.

Zentis' fruit spread actually contains, as advertised, “50 percent less sugar” - but this content has

not been replaced with fruit, but with water

.

Foodwatch awards "golden cream puffs" for deceiving customers - and makes demands on the Bavarian authorities

The Arla product was nominated by Foodwatch itself, the other four candidates were based on submissions from consumers.

The organization awarded the negative award for the tenth time.

Foodwatch called on the

Bavarian Food Safety and Veterinary Control Authority

in

Kulmbach

on Tuesday to "prohibit the misleading marketing of grassland".

The organization set a

deadline of September 22nd

and threatened the authorities with a

lawsuit

.

“The food law prohibits deception, the authorities are obliged to intervene,” emphasized the consumer advocates.

Last week, because of “continued deception” of consumers, they called for advertising to be stopped for three

products nominated

for the

despicable

prize: In addition to Hochland, the companies Arla and Danone were affected.

They "advertise perfectly normal products as particularly climate-friendly, animal-friendly or high-quality - that is illegal," criticized Manuel Wiemann from Foodwatch.

After all, all of the products mentioned were edible and drinkable.

A cheese from the Netherlands sold in Germany has now been recalled to the shops.

(

AFP / fn

)

Source: merkur

All life articles on 2020-09-08

You may like

News/Politics 2024-04-05T05:58:58.642Z
News/Politics 2024-03-28T15:56:07.966Z
News/Politics 2024-03-30T08:25:23.297Z
News/Politics 2024-03-29T05:26:34.433Z

Trends 24h

Life/Entertain 2024-04-19T19:50:44.122Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.