health
psychology
No motive: Sometimes people are just pure evil
The "Motivation" series has been occupying many of us for weeks.
People keep talking, and sometimes looking, for the boy who murdered his whole family for no reason.
The most troubling question of all is: if it happened there - could it happen in any home?
Dr. Ilan Rabinowitz dives inside
Tags
The motive
psychopath
murder
Dr. Ilan Rabinovich
Sunday, 10 January 2021, 09:57
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
Netanyahu on the corona mutation: We have taken the right steps ...
A dentist demonstrates how to clean the brush
A woman sighs
Last in the EU: The Netherlands began vaccinating against Corona ...
Anger in France over corona vaccine rate: "Scandal ...
Britain enters a new wave of restrictions and countries in Europe ...
The first in Israel: Rishon Lezion vaccinated teachers over ...
Edelstein: Vaccinating at a crazy rate, we will get millions more ...
"Motive" Trailer (yes docu)
On July 15, 1944, about three weeks before her imprisonment, Anne Frank wrote in her diary her most famous statement: "After all, I still believe that man has a good instinct in his heart. I cannot, even if I wanted to, base everything on death, suffering and chaos."
Since most of us hold this assumption to one degree or another, the "motivating" series of Tali Shemesh and Assaf Sudri, which airs on Yes Docu, shakes an entire country, 35 years after the murder of the family in Ein Kerem.
More on Walla!
NEWS
This way you will know if the person working next to you is actually a psychopath in disguise
To the full article
When we hear of a guy from a normative family, 14 years old, who kills both his parents and two sisters in their sleep, shooting with a zero-range rifle, with parts of their faces flying over the walls and left welded - we automatically tend to use a defense mechanism to protect us from anxious flooding.
After all, there were no early signs.
There was no involvement of welfare and relief.
Neighbors and friends told of an exemplary family.
The guy is an outstanding, gifted, sociable student who has never shown signs of violence.
There were no criminal cases and no police involvement.
So if it happened there - could it happen in any home?
No one is vaccinated?
We too?
These questions are chilling and terrifying.
More on Walla!
NEWS
Keeping in the stomach?
This is what repression really does to your psyche
Examine yourself: Are you passive-aggressive?
APPLIED TO GO: The button that can save your life
To protect ourselves and to try to understand an act that is not understood in any personal or cultural lexicon, we automatically try to find an explanation that will put our mind at ease and calm us down.
The first, which most relieves us, is that the act stemmed from a severe psychotic mental distress, one in which reality and imagination come together in a jumble and man is not judgmental and insightful, and is not responsible for his actions.
The second explanation is that there was a terrible secret in the family of continuous violence and incest and the guy absorbed and kept silent, absorbed and kept silent until he could no longer, and the ongoing distress subdued him.
But these explanations just do not work in this case.
Let's treat facts as they are and if you're having a hard time keeping them, please stop here.
The father of the family served in the reserve and a week before the murder taught his son to shoot and load the M16 rifle he received.
He did so at the request of the son.
I mean, it wasn't something momentary but something that went through his mind a week before the horrific shooting.
2. The guy shot and then told a first cover story, while reaching out to neighbors with shouts, that it was a burglar.
Realizing that it would not hold water, in an initial conversation at the scene with a juvenile investigator (there were no signs of burglary at home), he changed the story to that some outside body ordered him to shoot and he only did what a green body instructed him to do.
3. The boy was in a psychiatric ward for three weeks and there it was determined that he was judgmental (refers to his ability to stand trial) and punishable (refers to his mental state at the time of the square murder), stating that it was not a mental illness flare up and he did what he did. Freezing wind.
Did not bat an eyelid.
From the series "The Motive" (Photo: PR, yes docu)
4. An acute psychotic condition was not here, despite the guy's attempt to claim there were visions, because he was immediately coherent in his first interrogation, with no restlessness, no disturbances during thinking.
Cold and calculated.
He demanded on his own initiative, at the first hearing, that a restraining order be issued on the case (when his lawyer was surprised at how he knew about it).
He was worried about one thing: that he would get the textbooks so he would not miss his study material.
In his many conversations with senior psychiatrists in Israel, they felt that he was "making a school for them," politely and with seemingly full, passive-aggressive cooperation, he made sure to maintain his right to silence so that he would not incriminate himself.
5. It was important for him to ask in the plea deal, in consultation with his lawyer, to determine that it was a murder and not a murder, because then there would be a sole heir of his parents' pensions, property and house, who took their lives with his own hands.
So he made sure, in freezing cold, to correct his dead sister's girlfriend who met him in court (where she performed national service) that he was charged with "murder" and not "murder."
His personal teacher and school principal who came to visit him at the hospital also met a smiling, calm guy, who does not say a word about the horrible act.
Smiling in court with the cops around him, his mother's friends ignore her workplace, which he frequently visited, deciding not to come anymore because they had a hard time being in the presence of a "monster" as one of them determined.
6. The investigators' attempts to arouse emotion in him and perhaps to see a tear also came to naught when they took him to the cemetery to visit the four tombs in a row.
He did not bat an eyelid at the sight.
There is no plausible explanation.
From the motivating series (Photo: PR, yes docu)
7. The boy who grew up was interviewed six years later, by journalist Ruthi Yuval, so that this would help him in a third committee that would shorten and budget his sentence.
The latter was fascinated by a terribly intelligent guy.
He explained to her that as a result of the act he could have developed and soared to the heights he had reached, compared to the introverted and quiet guy he had been before.
He also more implies a violent father in the house who abused his daughters, a father who killed and therefore cannot defend himself.
The young man did himself an excellent service in a gate interview eagerly read by an entire country and prepared the ground for his release.
8. Despite the ruling of senior psychiatrists that it is not psychopathology, the judge ruled immediately at the beginning of the trial, without talking to the boy and only in light of the case reading and the skinny appearance of a boy who was not yet physically developed, even if the best psychiatrists do not know definition. To the plaintiff but to offer the defendant an immediate plea deal.
We have confirmed that judges with a compassionate heart and a rare empathy have been privileged to put in our gates, but I think that the judge is also one person and is not exalted by the people in choosing to use the collective defense mechanism.
9. The guy's lawyer, Yossi Arnon, treats his clients' portfolios as a game of chess, while seeing a few moves ahead.
What is clear is that the creators of the series made a "matte" clean.
It is clear to him that he lives his representation and continues to defend it.
Understands that flooding the issue about his former client, who now holds a senior and coveted position, husband and father to children, will cause him harm and undermine the ground on which he walks.
In his wisdom that much he inflates a balloon of theory that caused the guy to commit the horrific murder and gives a human explanation while closing the horrible puzzle.
He throws words but makes sure to be silent.
Do not interrogate secretly from you.
If you know, you will understand everything and you will even feel empathy and sympathy for the boy, even though he murdered his big sisters who loved him dearly and treated him like a prince.
10. Although the killer's older sister was in weekly care with the school counselor she never hinted at domestic violence.
The counselor reiterates that the treatment dealt solely with legitimate matters of normative problems of adolescence.
It is very, very rare that there will be domestic violence and there will be no witnesses.
That the neighbors at the door opposite, who were interviewed as very close friends who spend Saturday nights with the family regularly, did not hear a word or a faint shout.
There were no signs of suspicion among the parent companies or subsidiaries that were permanent housemates of the extinct family.
It is difficult to grieve for the dead and have no ability to defend themselves.
The phrase “murder and also inheritance” becomes more chilling than ever.
Even if there was alleged violence, the guy’s reaction after taking his family life does not match such a possibility.
This puzzle does not sit and does not work out.
The only thing that might fit such a thesis is that the father of the family sexually and physically abused his only son, while his wife and daughters are quietly silent and thus cooperate.
Therefore, in order to be redeemed from his misery he murders everyone and is silent because he is ashamed that the secret will be revealed.
And yet, he was not supposed to smile calmly then.
The mental turmoil was supposed to seep through.
Was the loss of studies at the forefront of his mind?
Is another type of blood flowing in his arteries?
There is no doubt that this is a very smart, mega-intelligent, sophisticated man who knows how to charm those around him.
He came very far over the years and made a soldier financially for his home.
Imbued with a goal, which explained to the interviewer that for him there is no way to fail.
He will try again and again until he succeeds.
Those around him in the present fail to associate him with the horrible act.
The question is whether abundance of mind is not at the expense of emotion?
Is there a basic flaw in morally binding codes?
Is there a punishing ego super?
Is another blood flowing in his arteries leading to behaviors and ways of thinking that are not clear to the psychodynamic world?
What is certain is that he never cooperated and did not really let anyone penetrate his mind.
His cognitive abilities helped him with that.
Complete and absolute opposition.
Keeps all the cards close to his chest.
Case report is unique and rare, which continues to fascinate with question marks for many years.
And maybe Anne Frank was just wrong, and sometimes the human heart has created evil from his youth, and it's just the classic psychopath (antisocial personality disorder) that overshadows his cognitive abilities and the mound in all of us?
I hope with all my heart that the boy who became a man, in charge of his children, found rest and peace of mind, and perhaps he was able to go to treatment, which he did well with.
But if I had to gamble, I think he is a control freak who can and thinks he can only trust and trust himself, and his successes will help him exclusively.
Share on Facebook
Share on WhatsApp
Share on general
Share on general
Share on Twitter
Share on Email
0 comments
