The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Weimar: Public prosecutor initiates proceedings against family judges


Did a judge from Weimar deliberately misuse the law to override the mask requirement in two schools? The decision has now been overturned, but the lawyer is threatened with consequences.

Enlarge image

Statue of the goddess of justice Justitia in front of a court (symbolic image)

Photo: Frank Rumpenhorst / dpa

The decision caused cheers among corona deniers - and horror among many lawyers: At the beginning of April, the Weimar district judge Christian Dettmar overturned the mask requirement at two schools in the city after a mother of two students had filed a complaint.

Now the decision may have consequences for the judge.

As the public prosecutor in Erfurt announced, an investigation was initiated against the judge in connection with a decision.

There is an initial suspicion that he was guilty of bending the law, said a spokesman.

Dettmar had suspended the mask requirement and other corona protective measures at the two schools with reference to an alleged child welfare risk.

In addition to the justification, lawyers had also questioned the judge's jurisdiction for the step.

Dettmar has a reputation in the city: He likes to point out to those involved who wear a mask in his negotiations about the ban on veiling in court.

The case of the two students allegedly impaired by the masks was also apparently deliberately leaked to the judge.

Removal of the mask requirement collected again

The Weimar Administrative Court had declared the mask requirement in teaching at Thuringian schools to be legal last week. In this context, the judges also pointed out that they regard the controversial judgment of the Weimar judge as "obviously unlawful". Family courts are not empowered to issue orders to authorities. There is no legal basis for this.

The public prosecutor's office now also sees "evidence that the accused has arbitrarily assumed his jurisdiction, although it was an administrative matter for which only administrative judicial channels are open." Thus there is an initial suspicion that he was guilty of a perversion of the law in this decision, "by deliberately and seriously distancing himself from the law and statute, that is, his decision is no longer supported by the statutory provisions, so that it appears arbitrary «.

An initial suspicion is given if, based on concrete facts, based on criminal experience, it appears possible that a criminal offense has been prosecuted.

The public prosecutor's office had already announced the investigation of the incident after several criminal charges had been received against the judge.

fek / AFP

Source: spiegel

All life articles on 2021-04-28

You may like

Life/Entertain 2021-04-29T05:14:15.388Z
Life/Entertain 2021-04-13T13:07:53.414Z
News/Politics 2021-03-28T15:16:30.085Z

Trends 24h

Life/Entertain 2021-05-14T15:19:35.748Z
Life/Entertain 2021-05-14T20:28:24.764Z
Life/Entertain 2021-05-14T14:13:58.372Z
Life/Entertain 2021-05-14T14:31:44.148Z


© Communities 2019 - Privacy