There are 718 amendments presented to the Chamber's Justice Commission by the parliamentary groups to the bill on criminal reform, many of which concern the prescription.
Ansa learns this from sources of the same Commission, where the filing of the proposed amendments is in progress.
Of these, 183 were presented by Fi, 127 by the Lega, 126 by Italia Viva, 96 by Fdi, 45 by M5s, 31 by the Pd and the remainder by the various components of the Mixed group.
Only 9 amendments were deposited by the Leu group, while as regards the components of the Mixed group, the largest number of amendments were deposited by Action- + Europe, with 63, followed by the linguistic minorities with 19, L'Alternativa c ' is, with 12, Cd with 7.
The government has not presented any proposals, but can deposit them at any time during the parliamentary process, while a meeting between the majority group leaders in the Commission and Minister Cartabia himself is expected next week.
A deflation of the number of trials
, through the strengthening of alternative rites, with further rewards for those who resort to them; filing conditional on actions for reparation and compensation by the accused; return of the statute of limitations if the duration of the process indicated in the Bonafede bill is exceeded in the appeal. These are the main points of the 31 amendments of the Democratic Party to the criminal trial reform bill filed with the House Justice Commission, as explained by the group leader Alfredo Bazoli. Another amendment, explains to Ansa Bazoli, provides that "the delegation should be exercised within 3 months instead of the 12 foreseen by the Bonafede bill, so as to speed up the entry into force of the reform as much as possible".
Our amendments affect the entire criminal delegation and not just the prescription
, and are both abrogative and ameliorative. The philosophy is that of a trial in a reasonable time that however does not contract the defensive guarantees. As regards the limitation period, we went into political coherence with our position, which was contrary to both the Bonafede bill and the so-called Conte 2 award. The starting point we propose is to suspend the prescription after the appeal, that is, the conclusion of the phase of merit, after which various solutions can be hooked up ". Lucia Annibali, leader of Iv in the Justice Commission of the Chamber tells Ansa, Annibali explains other amendments concerning the appeal:" we abrogate the fact that it is monochromatic, because there must be a collegial moment, just as we abolish the foreclosures of appeal ". As for the alternative rites,"we are in favor of expanding them: the delegation provides for many impediments, we are to eliminate them. And we are equally opposed to the indication of the priority criteria of the prosecution entrusted to the prosecutors, because they must be indicated by an ordinary law". The amendments on the timing of the preliminary investigations are also important: "the delegation establishes that failure to comply with the deadlines has consequences in terms of disciplinary sanctions, while we propose that it has procedural consequences, with the usability of subsequent acts after the deadline".because they must be indicated by an ordinary law ". The amendments on the timing of the preliminary investigations are also important:" the delegation establishes that failure to comply with the deadlines has consequences in terms of disciplinary sanctions, while we propose that it has procedural consequences, with the inability to use of the acts subsequent to the expiry of the time ".because they must be indicated by an ordinary law ". The amendments on the timing of the preliminary investigations are also important:" the delegation establishes that failure to comply with the deadlines has consequences in terms of disciplinary sanctions, while we propose that it has procedural consequences, with the inability to use of the acts subsequent to the expiry of the time ".
