The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Cancel culture attacks "the kiss not consented to" and therefore "suffered" by Snow White

2021-05-06T05:42:29.336Z


Are we going to see the creation of the hashtag “Balance your prince”? Two Californian journalists, "shocked" by the attraction dedicated to the adaptation of the film to Disneyland, propose to rewrite the fairy tale of the Brothers Grimm.


After the anachronistic rereading of the plays of the Greek playwright Aeschylus, after the unbolting of the statues of Churchill and Colbert, after the degradation of the Little Mermaid in Copenhagen, have we hit rock bottom?

It is the turn of

Snow White

, the mythological tale of the Brothers Grimm revisited as a fairy tale in the 20th century by Walt Disney, to be pilloried by the followers of a cancel culture, mixed here with the most uncompromising neofeminism.

To discover

  • Discover our file on Napoleon's bicentenary

To read also: "Cancel culture", "woke": when the American left goes mad

And as often, this evil wind from America, claims to be a zephyr, this west wind once deified by the Ancients. Tracking down the slightest trace of

"this white patriarchal domination"

, which would have subjugated the world since the dawn of time, two journalists from the SF Gate, the digital version of the important Californian newspaper

San Francisco Chronicle

, believed detected in the history of this unhappy princess, victim of the murderous jealousy of an evil queen, "

a major problem

". In the final scene, the gesture of saving love given to her by Prince Charming would be nothing more, according to them, than a vulgar “

kiss not consented to

” and therefore suffered by the heroine.

Read also: Aeschylus at the Sorbonne: a further step towards the “dictatorship of identities”?

The consciousness of his two apostles of cancel culture was suddenly awakened when they made the visit reserved the day before the reopening to “

VIPs

” of the Californian Disneyland park, on April 30, after 400 days of sanitary closure.

It was by seeing the attraction dedicated to

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs

, the adaptation of the original tale imagined by Walt Disney in 1937, that the blood of the two journalists of the SF Gate did not turn.

The evidence suddenly jumped out in their eyes, the princess asleep forever, - therefore unconscious -, by the poison of the horrible witch, had not been able to consent to the kiss administered (by force, therefore) by this prince who , decidedly, used many macho ways to achieve his unspeakable ends.

It would be worth creating a hashtag "Balance your Prince"!

To read also: Banned because it would normalize "the culture of rape"

,

Pépé le Putois, new victim of the "cancel culture"

To try to eradicate this

"absence of consent" which

they qualify as

"major problems"

, the two militant journalists propose (order) to Disney, neither more nor less, to rewrite the scenario of

Snow White

for, of course, to teach righteous thinking to children who, once they have grown up, could recklessly reproduce these deeds deemed infamous.

"

It's hard to understand why Disneyland, in 2021, is choosing to add a stage to such backward ideas about what a man is allowed to do to a woman,

" they write.

The prince will not come anymore ...

The two young women have not yet had the idea or the audacity to imagine a new ending or even a new scenario for

Snow White

. The murderous aims of the diabolical queen have not had the good fortune to stir their conscience. Perhaps we should suggest to our two exegetes a reconciliation between these two women and remove from history this prince not quite charming. This Snow White 2.0 would then have neither tail nor head, but would end well anyway. As in a fairy tale ...



Snow White: "

One day my prince will come ...

"

Source: lefigaro

All life articles on 2021-05-06

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.