The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

G8: Strasbourg, appeals by policemen convicted of raiding the Diaz school inadmissible

2021-07-17T14:53:27.321Z


'The allegations of the violation of human rights unfounded' (ANSA)  The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has declared inadmissible the appeals presented by some policemen who had been convicted of raiding the Diaz school during the 2001 G8 in Genoa.     "In the light of all the evidence available - the sentence reads -, the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Conventio


 The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has declared inadmissible the appeals presented by some policemen who had been convicted of raiding the Diaz school during the 2001 G8 in Genoa.


    "In the light of all the evidence available - the sentence reads -, the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention or its Protocols ".

It follows that the "accusations" made by the applicants "are manifestly unfounded" and the appeal is "inadmissible". 

The decision of the Strasbourg judges refers to the appeals filed by Massimo Nucera, at the time of the events chosen agent of the special unit of the seventh Mobile Department of Rome, Maurizio Panzieri, chief inspector aggregated to the same special unit, both sentenced to three and five years months (three of which were sentenced), Angelo Cenni and two other colleagues, foreman of the seventh Nucleo of the first Mobile Department of Rome.

In the provision relating to the first two agents, Nucera and Panzieri, the ECtHR, meeting as sole judge, "believes that the applicant was able to present his reasons in court which were answered with decisions that do not appear to be arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable, and there is no evidence to suggest that the proceedings were unfair. " Therefore "these allegations are manifestly unfounded" and the appeal is "inadmissible".

The same judgment was also expressed for the appeal presented by Angelo Cenni and his colleagues, for whom "in the light of all the evidence at its disposal, the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols ". The decision of the Court in the composition of a single judge is final and cannot be the subject of further appeals. 


Source: ansa

All life articles on 2021-07-17

You may like

News/Politics 2024-03-13T15:14:50.390Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.