(ANSA) - BRUSSELS, JUL 17 - The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has declared inadmissible the appeals presented by some policemen who had been sentenced for breaking into the Diaz school during the G8 in Genoa in 2001.
"In the light of all the evidence at its disposal - the judgment reads -, the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention or its Protocols ". It follows that the "accusations" made by the applicants "are manifestly unfounded" and the appeal is "inadmissible".
The decision of the Strasbourg judges refers to the appeals presented by Massimo Nucera, at the time of the facts chosen agent of the Special Unit of the seventh Mobile Department of Rome, Maurizio Panzieri, chief inspector aggregated to the same Nucleospeciale, both sentenced to three years and five months (of cuitre condemned), Angelo Cenni and two other colleagues, head of the seventh unit of the first Mobile Department of Rome. In the ruling relating to the first two agents, Nucera and Panzieri, the ECHR, meeting as sole judge, "believes that the plaintiff was able to present his reasons in court which was answered with decisions that do not appear to be arbitrary or manifestly unreasonable, and there is evidence to suggest that the proceedings were unfair. " Therefore "these accusations are manifestly unfounded "and the appeal is" inadmissible ". The same judgment was also expressed for the appeal presented by Angelo Cenni and his colleagues, for whom" in the light of all the evidence available, the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention or its Protocols. "The decision of the Court in the composition of a single judge is final and cannot be subject to further appeals. (ANSA).the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention or in its Protocols. "The decision of the Court in the composition of a single judge is final and cannot be the subject of further appeals. (ANSA).the Court considers that the facts presented do not reveal any appearance of violation of the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention or in its Protocols. "The decision of the Court in the composition of a single judge is final and cannot be the subject of further appeals. (ANSA).
