Dylan, it's clash, the biographer disputes the allegations of violence

(by Alessandra Baldini) (ANSA) - NEW YORK, 19 AUG - The lawyer of a woman who claims to have been sexually molested by Bob Dylan when she was a child disputes a biographer of the future Nobel laureate: "We have evidence to prove that the true ", said the lawyer Daniel Isaacs, in the face of the defense of the biographer Clinton Heylin, according to which Dylan, in the months of 1965 during which the violence in an apartment of the Chelsea Hotel took place, almost never found himself in New York. JC, these are the initials that conceal the identity of the accuser, states that Dylan "created an emotional connection with her" and then molested her within six weeks between April and May 56 years ago. Heylin, author of various books on Dylan including the recent "The Double Life of Bob Dylan Vol I,"1941-1966 ", he expressed doubts, moreover shared by other" dylanologists ", hooking himself on the artist's performance calendar." At that time Dylan was on tour in England and for two of those two weeks he was in Los Angeles , plus a day or two in Woodstock. The tour was 10 days but Bob left for London on April 26th and returned to New York on June 3rd. If he was in New York at that time, it wasn't for more than a day or two. When he wasn't on tour at that time, he was in Woodstock. And in New York not at the Chelsea Hotel, but in his manager's apartment in Gramercy Park. "Isaacs replied that the tour dates" do not contradict JC's allegations. "There are weeks in April, he added. legal, in which Dylan was not on tour:"We checked all his claims and did our research before going to court. There is evidence that he was in New York during the time we are concerned." JC's lawsuit, who is now 68 years old and 12 at the time of the alleged facts, was filed on August 14, at the expiration of the terms provided for by a law of the state of New York, which allowed victims of abuse during childhood to appear in court against their aggressors regardless of how old the facts reported were. (HANDLE).it was filed on August 14, after the deadline set by a New York state law, which allowed victims of childhood abuse to sue their attackers regardless of how old the reported facts were. (HANDLE).it was filed on August 14, after the deadline set by a New York state law, which allowed victims of childhood abuse to sue their attackers regardless of how old the reported facts were. (HANDLE).