Gustavo Iaies
08/27/2021 11:53 AM
Clarín.com
Society
Updated 08/27/2021 11:53 AM
The
teacher
does not understand why the boys react, because they discuss what she says, why they raise her against arguments.
Do they repeat the comments they heard from their parents?
It is possible, and it is very good that they recover different positions and think about them.
Beyond what the teacher says,
the boys express their arguments
, those of their parents, what they have heard in their neighborhood.
It is a huge defense to hear that the students have found arguments among their parents to be able to move forward, to be able to define the discussion, to give their position.
The teacher considers herself a heroine, she
advances in the discussion without understanding her role as a teacher
, without giving other arguments, without raising what other positions think about this issue.
Luckily the boys continue to react
, without raising a defense of what they think, simply raising their arguments.
At least attitudinally, they feel they can have a defense from their parents.
The teacher was suspended
, and felt paralyzed by the fact that the boys saw the video, that the parents also, and that they raised their observations and a ministerial sanction.
It is wonderful that society can react
, it is very good that the teachers' position is public, that parents can raise their positions. It is also wonderful that society joins in, that children see their parents and teachers participating in the discussion and saying what they think, so that they can think it too.
Teachers must understand that presenting their ideas in front of students is very good, as long as I present
all the positions.
If the boys think what I think because it is the only position, it does not add too much, it
hurts them to hear a single key.
It is good to make an effort so that the boys understand a better society, it is good that we understand that we must give them all the positions so that they can think.
That they know the arguments that we give ourselves in our society, that they know the position of everyone is very good.
It is a good experience that they can
put their teacher in discussion and participate in an investigation of the arguments.
Without a doubt, it is a good discussion to show the boys that it is possible to discuss the position of a public figure if they have been able to analyze
all the positions
and that they can do it.
It is about understanding that it is good to confront children with different arguments and find the best solutions.
The teacher is wrong, those who support her position too
, it is good that the boys listen and understand this debate.
It is about helping them understand positions, understand them and find the best ways out of a debate.
Society is right to protest, the teacher must assume that she is making a mistake when she
does not give the boys all the positions.
That the boys raise their doubts, that they confront arguments and positions of the adults, that they check the positions of the teachers and of the people that we have near is very good.
It is good that the boys can understand the discussion.
Let's be careful, our discussions are not those of the students, but they want to understand them.
It is good that they participate when they can understand what is being discussed and it is good that we give them all positions.
It helps them to understand and us as a society, that they understand it.
We go forward with arguments
, we are going to help them understand the debates that we are having.
* The author is Professor at the ESEADE University
Look also
Alberto Fernández defended teacher K: "That he had this debate is formidable because it opens the heads of the students"
The opposition criticized Alberto Fernández for his defense of teacher K: "The shouts of an adult to children are not a formidable debate, they are mistreatment"