Superbonus reshaped and stop the bonus facades, it is controversial

The non-extension of the 110% superbonus for single buildings and single and multi-family houses from the next financial maneuver under consideration by the Chambers inflames the controversy.

The measure, in fact, in great demand, should only apply to condominiums.

Also disappears - for now - the bonus for the renovation of the facades. 

"The facade bonus - underlines the Minister of Culture,

- is a measure that is working. It makes businesses work and makes villages and cities more beautiful, from historic centers to suburbs. The 90% incentive is justified precisely because facades, despite being privately owned, are in fact public goods that make Italian streets and squares more beautiful or more degraded. The measure - he adds - is simple to apply and in fact has just started. we will insist that it is not eliminated with the budget law ".

"We hope that the final version of the maneuver brought to the Council of Ministers does not exclude single-family and multi-family buildings from the 110% extension of the Superbonus - says

- or those that are functionally independent. Reserving the extension only to condominium buildings would be a mistake in several respects. Meanwhile, the many who, at the announcement of the extension, gave themselves more time to start the works, also by virtue of the fact that the boom in construction sites made it difficult to find companies. The other, even more serious, aspect is that

, especially the small and medium-sized ones where historically the building typology is different from the condominium.

So let's not talk about the villas of the super-rich, which the law already excluded from the beginning, but about millions of people who, like others, have the right to take advantage of the maxi concession.

We ask that the Ministry of Economy and the Government reconsider and find the appropriate coverage and methods to avoid discrimination that would have negative consequences on much of the Italian territory precisely at a time when, also thanks to the Superbonus, the economy is starting again in the name of sustainability ". 

"The next maneuver - ask the senator of the

Paolo Arrigoni, head of the party's energy department and deputy Giorgia Andreuzza, vice president of the Chamber's Productive Activities Commission - must contain the extension of all building bonuses (renovation, eco-bonus, seismabonus, facades, furnishings) at least for the whole of 2022 and Superbonus to 2023, in favor of the entire range of beneficiaries, including single-family buildings and functionally independent real estate units. The League on this was and is clear: the expectations of owners and companies, already in difficulty due to the pandemic and expensive materials, as well as the cumbersome legislation to be simplified, which trusted in a renewal of incentives, cannot be betrayed. We believe it is necessary to read the expectations of the real country, especially now that the national economic life has a valid prospect of growth:only starting from 2024 it will be possible to imagine a decrease in the measures, when the macroeconomic conditions of our economy are likely to be overall improved and more stable ".

"I hope that the government wants to revive the superbonus in the current formula, which also includes single-family buildings, villas and single houses," says the

Martina Nardi. "Single houses - explains President Nardi - are prevalent in provincial cities and in internal areas. I don't think the government wants to penalize these territories to the advantage of large cities. All bonuses, including those for anti-seismic interventions and for facades , are a determining factor in the increase in GDP. And the country needs to grow ".

"The costs of the transition - Senator Alessandra Gallone of

says in the Chamber

- must not fall on the citizens and we know that the government is working for this. This morning there was a lot of excitement at the news of the extension of the superbonus 110 at the condominium tops. The eco-bonuses must be maintained, extended and extended, there are many other measures that can be cut. We must pursue all-round sustainability and know how to combine environmental sustainability with economic and social sustainability, under penalty of impoverishment and blocking of the country system ".

Confedilizia worried about the impact:

"The elimination of the 90 percent facade bonus and the non-extension of the 110 percent super bonus for single-family homes and functionally independent real estate units are of great concern. The first is a very useful incentive, being aimed at redeveloping our cities, and widely used by families and businesses. The second is essential to make many homes often owned by low-income families safer and more efficient (they are not the 'villas' that are talked about in these hours) and in many cases located in seismic risk areas ". "We hope that the majority political forces will induce the government to review its choices, which seem to be aimed at eliminating the most widely applied incentives. The limitation of the super bonus, however,stands in sharp contrast to the expectations of the sector fueled by the Executive itself and will create further tension on a market already heavily stressed by the lack of materials and companies available as well as by the disproportionate increases in the costs of the interventions ", concludes the association.

 The

gathered in Anaci recall having "fought for the extension of the Superbonus 110%, which certainly must not end in 2022 but in our opinion not even in 2023: it should continue in 2025, with the PNRR".

This was stated by Francesco Burrelli, national president of Anaci, on the sidelines of a conference on the subject organized in Florence by Tera Progetti.

"It is unthinkable - he said - that in the space of a year all the buildings in Italy, over 1.2 million condominiums, can be made more efficient and safe".