Work without a corona test?
According to a state labor court, employees who refuse to take the test can expect a loss of income.
Munich - Anyone who refuses regular corona tests ordered by the employer may have to expect a loss of income.
This emerges from a recent ruling by the Munich State Labor Court (LAG) on the case of an orchestral flautist.
also read
Pressure on the unvaccinated: Bavarian craft warns of a split in the workplace
The Bavarian trade fears a split in the workplace should the pressure on non-vaccinated people be increased through the companies.
Pressure on the unvaccinated: Bavarian craft warns of a split in the workplace
Stricter corona rules apply in Hesse
From this Thursday (November 11th), stricter corona rules apply in Hesse.
They mainly affect people who are neither vaccinated nor recently survived an infection with the coronavirus.
A rapid antigen test is no longer sufficient for areas or facilities in which the 3G rule applies and thus only vaccinated, convalescent or tested people have access.
Stricter corona rules apply in Hesse
Verdict: No liability in the event of a motorway accident with a domino effect
Changing lanes on motorways is a tricky moment - and sometimes it crashes.
But the question of guilt is not always easy to resolve.
Especially when there was no direct contact.
Verdict: No liability in the event of a motorway accident with a domino effect
The woman, who was employed by a larger opera orchestra, had refused to be tested as part of the hygiene concept there before participating in rehearsals or performances.
Intervention in physical integrity?
The musician justified the rejection with the fact that the test meant a considerable interference with the physical integrity and carried the risk of injuries, which are particularly problematic for players of wind instruments.
But the court did not follow suit.
The LAG found that the obligation to test is proportionate and not an inadmissible interference.
Especially when working as a flautist, the other orchestra members could not be protected in any other way.
In addition, the collective agreement entitled the employer to demand the test.
As a result, he did not have to employ the woman or pay her any remuneration as long as she was not allowed to participate in rehearsals and performances.
dpa
