Aldo Gucci heirs against 'House of Gucci', harms dignity

"The members of the Gucci family reserve every initiative to protect the name, image and dignity of themselves and their loved ones". Thus ends a harsh letter signed by the heirs of Aldo Gucci, against Ridley Scott's film, 'House of Gucci', in cinemas from December 16 in Italy. They complain that the production '' did not bother to consult the heirs before describing Aldo Gucci '', and consider '' even more censurable '' the reconstruction '' of a woman definitively sentenced for having been the instigator of Maurizio's murder Gucci '' portrayed in the film and cast members '' statements as a victim ''. In the letter he accuses himself of "a narrative that is anything but accurate"; a vision of "members of the Gucci family as thugs, ignorant and insensitive to the world around them "and above all" the indulgent tones towards a woman who, definitively condemned for having been the instigator of the murder of Maurizio Gucci, is painted not only in the film, but also in the statements of the cast members, as a victim trying to survive in a masculine and male-dominated corporate culture ". According to the heirs, a circumstance far from the truth:" Gucci - reads the letter - was an inclusive company. Indeed, precisely in the 1980s, the historical context in which the film is set, "there were different women who held top positions: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it".and above all "the indulgent tones towards a woman who, definitively convicted of having been the instigator of the murder of Maurizio Gucci, is portrayed not only in the film, but also in the statements of the cast members, as a victim trying to survive in a masculine and macho corporate culture ". According to the heirs, a circumstance far from the truth: "Gucci - reads the letter - was an inclusive company. Indeed, in the 1980s, the historical context in which the film is set," there were several women who held positions at the top: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it ".and above all "the indulgent tones towards a woman who, definitively convicted of having been the instigator of the murder of Maurizio Gucci, is portrayed not only in the film, but also in the statements of the cast members, as a victim trying to survive in a masculine and macho corporate culture ". According to the heirs, a circumstance far from the truth: "Gucci - reads the letter - was an inclusive company. Indeed, in the 1980s, the historical context in which the film is set," there were several women who held positions at the top: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it ".she is portrayed not only in the film, but also in the statements of the cast members, as a victim trying to survive in a male and male-dominated corporate culture. "A circumstance according to the heirs far from the truth:" Gucci - reads the letter - is been an inclusive company. Indeed, precisely in the 1980s, the historical context in which the film is set, "there were different women who held top positions: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it".she is portrayed not only in the film, but also in the statements of the cast members, as a victim trying to survive in a male and male-dominated corporate culture. "A circumstance according to the heirs far from the truth:" Gucci - reads the letter - is been an inclusive company. Indeed, precisely in the 1980s, the historical context in which the film is set, "there were different women who held top positions: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it".the historical context in which the film is set, "there were different women who held top positions: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it".the historical context in which the film is set, "there were different women who held top positions: whether they were members of the family or strangers to it".