"Fan, excuse me ... what exactly are your requirements as fans?";
"So like this: want to determine who the referees will be! If not - we have decided to burn down the club! We also want to determine, once and for all, who will be the players, who will be the coaches, who will be the result, and who will be the weather";
"And if it is not given to you?";
"We will burn down the club."
This immortal sketch of the pale tracker is the first thing that comes to mind at the end of the interview of Amnon Abramovitch and potential prime minister Yair Lapid: an interviewee who apparently asked for, and received, all the perfect conditions before entering the field.
It seems that Lapid demanded that the coach be Abramovich and come to play for a draw, that the field be home, that the weather be warm and comfortable, and that the result be known in advance: an interview that can go straight into the massage menu at any pampering spa.
To the credit of the "Ulpan Shishi" editorial staff, it has been said with great talent that it clarifies an opening clarification, that Yair Lapid is celebrating ten years of retiring from the presenter's chair and entering politics - and it seems that a decade of celebrating his club's .
Abramovich came to find out with Lapid how he is doing after a decade in politics, and to take him out from the start with the question of why he is so generous when it comes to rotations. From there, Amnon went on to gently tell Lapid that associate appointments seem "greedy" (and not really a form of corruption), and criticize him for breaking a promise about the wasteful and inflated government. Do not worry, this question was also formulated by Abramovich in companies, under the wording containing "does not exist ... for the time being" - because it is known that a serious interviewer knows how to give the politician in front of him time to correct. In every detail that can get headlines from a politician, or at least an interesting interview.
And we will move on to all those who did not come to the celebration: the obvious questions.
Biden has not "counted" calls from Naftali Bennett for more than a month?
An education minister who is practically sabotaging the children's vaccination campaign?
It seems that former colleague Abramovich can be trusted to skip to the next easy question.
During the edition, the commentator Amit Segal sat in the studio, who was often sent with Abramovich to interview politicians and return with balanced documents.
This time they did not even return to the discussion in the studio, where no doubt the staff would have raised at least some of the issues that less appeared in the meeting with Abramovich.
In conclusion, this was supposed to be a serious interview with politician Yair Lapid, so why most of the time did it feel like coffee with Lehi?
Studio Friday, Rainbow 12
Were we wrong?
Fixed!
If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us
