The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Ten years after the massacre, Breivik asks for parole

2022-01-18T10:00:51.106Z


The judge has two days to decide (ANSA) (ANSA) - OSLO, 18 JAN - Ten years after the massacre in which he killed 77 people between Oslo and Utoya, the right-wing extremist Anders Breivik will ask the judge for parole today.     The application will be presented by the killer via video link from the Skien prison gymnasium.     On July 22, 2011, the right-wing extremist first detonated a bomb near the government headquarters in Oslo, killi


(ANSA) - OSLO, 18 JAN - Ten years after the massacre in which he killed 77 people between Oslo and Utoya, the right-wing extremist Anders Breivik will ask the judge for parole today.


    The application will be presented by the killer via video link from the Skien prison gymnasium.


    On July 22, 2011, the right-wing extremist first detonated a bomb near the government headquarters in Oslo, killing eight people, then killed another 69, mostly teenagers, by opening fire on a Labor youth summer camp. on the island of Utoya.

He was sentenced to 21 years in prison with the possibility of an extension.


    "As in any other rule of law, a detainee has the right to request parole and Breivik has decided to use it, explained the lawyer, Oystein Storrvik.


    According to analysts, the request has no chance of success in a country that he has not witnessed such an extreme level of violence since World War II. Furthermore, Breivik has never regretted his crimes. Indeed, amidst Nazi greetings and ideological digressions, he has attempted to transform his every appearance in court into a sort of political rally


    . judge has until Thursday 20 to evaluate the request. (ANSA).


Source: ansa

All life articles on 2022-01-18

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-03-15T18:06:33.836Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.