Just give us more editions like this | Israel today

It may be a slight effect of the light heat from the omicron that fell on me, but this time I applaud the two sixth editions that did quite a bit of respect to the Israeli media - and finally gave us an important and unifying discussion that is not divided into left-right, "just not bibi" or "just No disgrace "- Is the Israeli police invading the cell phones of innocent citizens?

In the two main interviews, the head of the police investigation department tried to explain that the things were investigated (who said that the police do not act quickly?), And that the findings are that there was no violation of the law.

Commentators were waiting for him at the panels, demonstrating knowledge in the field of cellular takeover software (Alon Ben-David), as well as in the field of police takeover software for the engineering of consciousness.

While in "Ulpan Shishi" the commentators made an effort and usually managed to ignore the typical rivalry and deal with the issue, on the 13th the flash was recorded to bring former judge Zvi Segal to the panel, who admitted that judges do not have the full picture and technological understanding when they sign wiretapping orders.

• For shows, entertainment and attractions up to NIS 100, click here

Despite the discourse bypassing the position in the two studios, a very important question was missing: Why did the Attorney General limit his examination to the last two years only, the two years in which the Alsheikh and Shai Nitzan duo are no longer part of the system?

And when it comes to law enforcement, we also won two journalistic "bombs" each from a different edition:

in "Ulpan Shishi" Moshe Nussbaum first published that the investigation file regarding the assault of MK Silman (which apparently was not) will be closed, not least thanks to cooperation "Very limited" of the coalition chairman.

Beyond the important revelation per se, it is a pity that a discussion in the studio on the question of whether false testimony is also considered a breach of trust is avoided.

Amit Segal cynically suggested using the Pegasus software to investigate the truth, but the panel has already moved on to the next item.

Ayala Hasson took advantage of the fact that a panel of judges sat on the panel and inquired about the chances of a fair trial in Netanyahu's cases: "Judges sitting in such a case, the State of Israel against the former prime minister - a case that ended his tenure The State Attorney's Office? "

To this the judge replied: "The short answer is no."

By the way, even the long one is not encouraging.

Even so, give us more Fridays like this.

Friday editions, Rainbow 12, Network 13

Were we wrong?

Fixed!

If you found an error in the article, we'll be happy for you to share it with us