The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Draghi: 'We are against superbonus'. M5s: 'Unacceptable attack'

2022-05-03T18:37:06.901Z


"We are an ecological government - said the premier in Strasbourg, but we do not agree on everything. The cost of efficiency has more than tripled", said the premier. For the Cinquestelle the prime minister has 'thrown the mask'. Fraccaro: 'Don't boycott him'. Wolves: 'Draghi is 110% right'. Confedilizia: 'Companies in crisis due to credit limits' (ANSA)


 "Our government was born as an

ecological government

, it makes the climate and the digital transition its most important pillars. But

we do not agree on everything, we are not on the 110% bonus,

because the cost of efficiency has more than tripled and the price of investments to carry out the restructuring have tripled, because it takes away the price negotiation ".

This was stated by Prime Minister Mario Draghi speaking at the plenary of the European Parliament.

"The Minister of the Environment was extraordinary, he made extraordinary measures. We may not agree on the 110% superbonus and we do not agree on the validity of this measure - explains Draghi -. I cite an example: the cost of improving efficiency is more than tripled thanks to the 110% measures, the prices of the investments necessary for the restructuring have more than tripled because 110% by itself takes away the incentive to negotiate on the price. Then, things go on in Parliament, the government has done what he could and our minister is very good ", concludes Draghi.


   Draghi's sentence alerted the Cinquestelle.

"Mario Draghi in his speech in Strasbourg during the plenary of the European Parliament declared that he disagreed with the Superbonus; frankly we had already deduced it from the continuous blocks and changes made to the measure in recent months which in fact risked making it unusable . I would like to remind our prime minister that the Superbonus is an expression of the parliamentary will of all political forces, and for this reason, even if his personal opinion is negative, he cannot boycott a measure that has received praise from the same on several occasions. European Union."

Thus in a note the M5S deputy

Riccardo Fraccaro

.

"We are quite perplexed by the inadmissible peremptory nature with which Prime Minister Draghi lashed out at 110% against the Superbonus

. wanting to limit the circulation of tax credits, there is precisely this intolerance of the Prime Minister towards the provision ".

Thus in a note the M5s senators in the Industry, Commerce and Tourism committee Gianni Girotto, Cristiano Anastasi, Marco Croatti, Gabriele Lanzi and Sergio Vaccaro.

The 5 stars remembering that the bonus "in 2021 contributed decisively to the + 6.6% of GDP which the prime minister benefited from.

An incidence, that of the Superbonus at 110%, confirmed by dozens of analyzes and studies, which led European commissioners such as Timmermans and Simson to highlight its innovative significance.

In short, while Europe applauds and looks with curiosity at the positive effects of this facilitation, our prime minister throws it down loudly in Strasbourg: an evident contradiction ". Not only that. The premier's words are" a resounding slap in the face of the majority who he claims, given that the 110% Superbonus was born thanks to the intuition of the M5s but now finds the undisputed favor of the whole Parliament.

For one reason: this fiscal mechanism has not only resulted in energy savings equal to that of the electricity consumption of one million and 100 thousand households in twelve months, but has also had saving effects on

construction, with employment consequences unthinkable before the ok to measure ". Furthermore," we would like to remind Draghi that the escalation of costs in the construction sector has occurred throughout Europe, even in those countries that do not have building bonuses .

So talking about energy efficiency improvements with tripled costs leaves the time it finds, a bit like at the beginning of the year when the finger was pointed at the boom in fraud related to the Superbonus, a boom that later turned out to be a false historical "."

We ask Prime Minister Draghi - the parliamentarians of the Movement - for greater caution: try to give this relief a clear regulatory framework without obstacles and changes in the scenario every month, then we will talk about it again ".

"

On the super bonus Draghi is not 100 percent right, but 110 percent.

There is no longer anyone to negotiate on prices or ask for more quotes, the incentive has turned into a sort of footer paid by the state. All of us. , including the poorest, we are paying for the renovation of apartments and houses to homeowners, creating further public debt and a degeneration of the market ".

This was declared by

Maurizio Lupi,

president of Noi con Italia.

THE CONFEDILIZATION, COMPANIES IN CRISIS FOR CREDIT LIMITS

- "The Prime Minister said today that he is opposed to the 110 percent superbonus for seismic improvement and energy saving interventions in buildings, as it is a harbinger of price increases. The problem reported by the premier exists, even if the increase of prices was determined by multiple factors "but" what is perplexing is the fact that the Government, unable to block this measure as it was desired by almost all of the Parliament, has introduced evident obstacles to its concrete application in recent months, in particular through the limits imposed on the assignment of credit ".

This was stated by the president of Confedilizia, Giorgio Spaziani Testa, underlining in a note that "this way of proceeding, in addition to not being distinguished by transparency,

it has produced two very negative consequences: the first was that of putting into extreme difficulty (in some cases even in crisis) companies, professionals and owners who had the construction sites open;

the second was to block the use of all the other incentives for building interventions, for which the credit transfer mechanism and invoice discount also allowed for application by low-medium income citizens ".

Source: ansa

All life articles on 2022-05-03

You may like

News/Politics 2024-02-26T19:33:14.851Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.