CSM: the examination of the Cartabia reform begins in the Senate chamber

Government under pressure in the Senate on the justice reform of Minister Cartabia.

The League maintains its amendments and has announced the request for a secret ballot.

The examination of the reform of the judiciary and the CSM has begun in the Senate, approved overnight by the Justice Commission in the same text licensed by the Chamber.

Today a first phase of about two hours of general discussion is planned;

from 6 pm the votes on the amendments will begin.

The final vote of the provision is scheduled for tomorrow.

If the Chamber text is confirmed, it will be law.  

"I confirm that we will ask for a secret vote," Simone Pillon, the leader of the League in Committee on Justice, told ANSA about the indiscretion circulated in the Senate.

The vote would concern an article of the provision.

"How League are we satisfied? No. We will do better when we win the elections. We have kept our amendments, we will vote them with conviction and we ask the other political forces to do the same," said Pillon, concluding his speech in the Chamber on the reform of the 'judicial system and the CSM.

"A true and incisive justice reform - he said - is what the country needs today more than ever, which is why the League has worked responsibly and made proposals for improvements to the text put forward by Minister Cartabia on CSM and reform of the

judicial system.

Italy needs a legal system that looks at Giovanni Falcone's idea of ​​a judge: a figure above the parties who cannot share training, unified careers or interchangeable destinies with prosecutors.

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

Italy needs a legal system that looks at Giovanni Falcone's idea of ​​a judge: a figure above the parties who cannot share training, unified careers or interchangeable destinies with prosecutors.

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

Italy needs a legal system that looks at Giovanni Falcone's idea of ​​a judge: a figure above the parties who cannot share training, unified careers or interchangeable destinies with prosecutors.

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

a figure above the parties who cannot share training, unified careers or interchangeable destinies with prosecutors.

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

a figure above the parties who cannot share training, unified careers or interchangeable destinies with prosecutors.

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

It is also necessary to pursue the issue of the civil liability of magistrates, because it is absurd that anyone in our country should be held accountable for their actions while the magistrates do not.

We must move away from the danger of hegemony, as Antonio Gramsci understood it, of a judiciary that transforms itself into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back every time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

of a judiciary that is transformed into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back each time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

of a judiciary that is transformed into an instrument for hitting political opponents and without the possibility of being confronted with its own responsibilities.

As a League we will fight on these issues and we will continue to come back each time, to guarantee the Italians a just justice ".

"Bringing obstruction to justice means undermining the foundations of the government itself, it is an unsustainable attitude", said the secretary of the Democratic Party Enrico Letta al Nazareno, speaking of the League's vote on the reform of the CSM.