We knew the care taken by the WHO in choosing the names of the SARS-CoV-2 variants so as not to offend anyone.
The organization is now tackling monkeypox, which is spreading to some forty countries including France after having long been contained in Africa.
The disease will soon have to change its name, as it is deemed misleading and discriminatory.
The WHO is indeed considering "changing the name of the virus" from monkeypox, said last week the Director General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, promising "announcements as soon as possible" on this point.
Beyond the single virus, it would also and above all be a question of modifying the name of its different strains, as well as that of the disease itself.
Read also1000 cases of monkeypox in the world: what if the epidemic had actually lasted for several months?
Why this change, at a time when monkeypox has been spotted in more than 40 countries and could soon be considered an international emergency by the WHO?
The latter did not openly explain the reasons for its decision, but it would come after multiple concerns about stigmatizing terms for African countries.
This consideration concerns above all the strains of the virus.
They are indeed named after regions or countries in Africa: we speak of the strain of West Africa and that of the Congo Basin, the second being much more deadly than its cousin.
A platform, and concerns
At the beginning of June, about thirty scientists, many from Africa, thus wrote a forum to ask to change these names, judging it urgent to put in place “a nomenclature which is neither discriminatory nor stigmatizing”.
A new name would acknowledge the current reality of the disease.
While this was long limited to ten African countries, 84% of new cases were detected this year in Europe and 12% on the American continent.
Why, then, not limit ourselves to changing the names of the strains and continuing to speak of “monkey pox”?
First, because it's misleading.
If it were true that in Africa the disease had been transmitted by monkeys (or by other animals) in the past, the current outbreak shows that the new strain is now transmitted easily from one human to another.
Above all, even originally, "it's not really a disease linked to monkeys", notes virologist Oyewale Tomori to AFP.
This name is the legacy of the conditions in which the disease was discovered in the 1950s: Danish researchers had discovered it in monkeys in their laboratory.
But, in real life, it is usually caught from rodents.
VIDEO.
“The world does not pay the same attention to the lives of black and white people”, says the WHO
Alongside this misleading side, there are, again, concerns about the stigmatizing nature of such a name.
“Monkeys are generally associated with countries in the South, particularly Africa,” researcher Moses John Bockarie recalls on The Conversation.
These concerns are part of a broader context where Africa has frequently been targeted as the source of diseases that have spread around the world.
“We especially saw this with AIDS in the 1980s, Ebola during the 2013 epidemic, then with Covid-19 and the supposed South African variants”, remarks epidemiologist Oliver Restif to AFP.
As such, the image is also important.
Mr. Restif regrets that the media have often chosen unfortunate illustrations for their articles on monkeypox.
These are often "old photographs of African patients", while current cases "are much less serious", he notes.
A new name, to change your image?