The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Police murders in Kusel: the co-defendant charged the alleged main perpetrator Andreas S. heavily after the fact

2022-06-30T11:52:10.248Z


Who shot two police officers on a country road near Kusel at the end of January? At the trial, the two accused accused each other. Now an investigator described statements from an interrogation – they sound clear.


Enlarge image

Sub-defendant Florian V. with his defense attorney Thomas Will at the start of the trial on June 21

Photo: UWE ANSPACH / AFP

In the murder trial of two police officers killed near Kusel in Rhineland-Palatinate, an investigator reproduced the descriptions of the co-defendant Florian V. during an interrogation after the crime.

According to this, V. made a clear statement during the survey on February 18, around two weeks after the crime – and blamed the main defendant Andreas S. for all the shots.

According to the officer, V. testified that his accomplice S. first said during the nightly vehicle inspection, "What, hunting poaching?"

According to the descriptions, the policewoman who was hit was “taken down by the force”.

S. is said to have threatened to shoot V. as well

The 39-year-old main defendant also shot the policewoman's colleague.

V. said he heard two shots and heard a cry of pain.

After the shots, S. ordered him to look for his lost documents and threatened that he would "otherwise put them aside".

According to the dpa news agency, the 33-year-old V. nodded several times when the investigator described his earlier statements.

According to dpa, Andreas S. listened with folded hands or took notes.

When the judge said in a description that S. was very precise, the 39-year-old flared up.

'Mr Chairman, you say I'm quite specific.

What's this about?

It's not about two chewing gums."

Prosecutors accuse the main defendant of murdering a 24-year-old police officer and a 29-year-old police commissioner five months ago to cover up poaching.

The prosecution is largely based on the descriptions of Florian V.

Investigators assume there was an exchange of fire between the police officer and the main suspect.

The police commissioner is said to have shot his service pistol empty – without hitting the attacker.

S. claims to have shot in self-defense

S. had recently charged V. with a read statement in court.

Accordingly, he only shot because he thought he was in a kind of self-defense situation.

It was shot at him first.

S. also said that V. was holding a shotgun and appeared "mentally absent".

Later, V. also shot the injured policewoman lying on the ground in the face.

The presentation runs counter to the charge, according to which S. fired all the shots himself.

V. accuses the public prosecutor's office of attempted frustration.

He is said to have helped cover up the tracks, but not shot.

fek/dpa

Source: spiegel

All life articles on 2022-06-30

You may like

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.