The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

Jean-Luc Godard or cinema by itself

2022-09-13T10:11:13.525Z


In 1997, during the Cannes Film Festival, the director of Contempt came to present two chapters of History(ies) of cinema. During a press conference, he delivered some of his thoughts to an audience of journalists.


At the Cannes Film Festival, Jean-Luc Godard was both at home and always apart.

In 1997, he came to present

Histoire(s) du cinema

in the Un Certain Regard section.

The sulphurous Franco-Swiss filmmaker then complied with the exercise of the press conference.

Flanked by his producer Nicolas Seydoux, from Gaumont, he had delivered to an audience provided with journalists some of his thoughts.

Reunion with an exotic spirit in a few selected pieces.

stories

As a child, people used to tell me: 'Don't tell stories'.

Ever since I started making films, people have told me: "You don't know how to tell stories"...

Histoire(s) du cinema

is a way of taking stock of my story in the history of cinema that I have accompanied since forty years.

Cinema is the only one able to talk about History, “great History”, as they say, with its own history.

There is no history of painting by painting, no history of music in music.

What I wanted to do, naively, was for the cinema to speak, in the words of Paul Valéry, “in a low voice, saying great things, strong and sweet things”.

Through cinema, which I explore in a somewhat archaeological way, we can try to find the thread of history.

Read alsoDeath of Jean-Luc Godard, master of the New Wave and legend of the seventh art, at 91

Movie theater

“Cinema wanted to be everything.

There is a worldwide desire for cinema.

German producer Erich Pommer said: “I will make the whole world cry in his chair”.

Gallimard never said that.

He couldn't be everything, but he was something.

Certain peoples, at certain times, recognized themselves in the image of the world sent back by the filmmakers.

Italian neorealism represented the change of a vision of the world.

Italy has sinned, but because the Rossellini of

Rome, an open city,

was able to admit this misery, there was a kind of redemption, it lived again.

A film is a moment or a piece of cinema, just as a man is a moment or a piece of humanity.

Movies

“A film is a moment or a piece of cinema, just as a man is a moment or a piece of humanity.

Almost every country makes movies, can have great filmmakers.

But not everyone has a cinema.

There is a German, Russian, American, even French cinema, because there were so many French filmmakers who loved cinema that it ended up forming an idea of ​​cinema.

But in England, for example, there are films, no cinema.

The English recognize themselves in Shakespeare and Dickens, not in the productions of Rank.

To read also BB's sauerkraut, his contempt for Tarantino, facetime on the Croisette... Stories from Godard

Business success

The Fifth Element

by Luc Besson

(produced by Nicolas Seydoux, like Godard's film, editor's note)

manages to make money, which hasn't happened to me often.

I can't believe I can live with films that don't bring in anything.

Except to my producer.

There are films that work, but from a strictly accounting point of view, cinema as a whole is not made to work.

With the exception of

Birth of a Nation

, which was both an artistic success and a financial success, there is no relationship between quality and revenue.

The Americans have always admitted this, but on this point they are letting themselves be influenced by the Europeans.

And Europeans, when a film makes a lot of money, they also want people to say it's good.

Good film

“A good film is a film in which there are discoveries.

It's the same process as with scientists: we have similar instruments, microscopes, telescopes, to observe reality, and by comparing the data we see an unexpected fact.

What cinema has brought is editing: establishing a connection between two real things.

It is a peaceful art: it is made to bring people together.”

See also

Breathless, Contempt, Pierrot le Fou…

Jean-Luc Godard in six works from his filmography

Technical

“I was interested in the technique only to arrive at the content.

The special effects, the special effects, it's good in

Beauty and the Beast

, because they have a meaning.

I had fun with the second

Terminator

, but overall I would like these kinds of movies to be more childish and less childish.

Cinema has this originality compared to literature or the painting that is done with machines.

But we did not pay attention to this relationship with the machine, and it became inhuman.

walking sticks

“I remember a time when I was transporting the reels of a short film by Jacques Rozier,

Blue Jeans

.

I ran into Jack Nicholson who was also carrying film reels.

Well, we don't see that anymore.

Nor the big arguments like there were around

L'Avventura.

»

Source: lefigaro

All life articles on 2022-09-13

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-03-24T09:34:18.129Z

Trends 24h

Life/Entertain 2024-04-19T02:09:13.489Z

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.