The revelations contained in the autobiography entitled 'Spare', however embarrassing for the rest of the royal family, represent only a fraction of what
Prince Harry
could have told.
He says it himself, according to a last interview granted this time to Byrony Gordon, signature of the Daily Telegraph: the first to a British newspaper - and already paginated in the opening for tomorrow's edition - after the book's release on Tuesday.
In the interview, the Duke of Sussex states that the volume was originally "double" in length and that sufficient material was excluded from the final revision to create "another book", in theory.
He then explains that the deleted details concern in particular his relationships, before and after his marriage to Meghan, with his father Charles, who succeeded Queen Elizabeth on the throne as King Charles III last September, and above all with his older brother William, heir to the crown.
The final version of
'Spare' does not include revelations which "my father and brother would never have forgiven"
, continues Harry.
As if to claim that he did not want to cross the red line in breaking with family members, after the traumatic tear from the Windsor house that resulted in his transfer to the USA three years ago.
But also as if to suggest that they can do it: at least in fear of anonymous sources inside Buckingham Palace, evoked by the same newspaper, according to which the rebel duke and his wife Meghan could still be pushed in the future to publish other volumes, for financial reasons .
ANSA Agency
'Hurt by Harry's revelations?' William and Kate ignore question - World
The royals return to public engagements after the storm that followed Harry's book: the princes of Wales inaugurate a hospital, Charles III goes to Scotland (ANSA)