"Juventus has committed a sporting disciplinary offence, taking into account the seriousness and the repeated and prolonged nature of the violation."
The FIGC Court of Appeal explains it in the reasons, which will be made official shortly, of
the -15 ruling
against Juve for capital gains.
On the merits, it was considered that Juve had committed the offence, "given the documentation coming from the managers" of the club "with confessional value and from the related manuscripts, the unequivocal interceptions and the further evidence relating to interventions of concealment of documentation or even manipulators of invoices".
The Federal Court of Appeal of the FIGC - ANSA learns - has admitted the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office for revocation, it is explained in the reasons, of the capital gains process for Juventus, "faced with a radically different picture of the facts due to the impressive amount of documents arrived from the Public Prosecutor's Office of Turin which highlighted the intentionality underlying the alteration of the transfer operations and the related values".
"As regards the sanction - the reasons continue -, the Court took into account the particular seriousness and the repeated and prolonged nature of the violation and the same intensity and diffusion of awareness of the situation in the talks between the managers of FC Juventus SpA".
In the new facts that led to the reopening of the sporting process for capital gains, "there is no specific demonstrative evidence for other companies".
This is what emerges - ANSA learns - from the reasons for the sentence, which are about to be published, of the Federal Court of Appeal which inflicted 15 penalty points on Juve and acquitted the other clubs.
The sporting judges have in fact considered that "in the new facts that have arisen there is no specific demonstrative evidence that allows to support the accusation and even less does it seem possible to argue that there has been a systematic alteration of several balance sheets".
