The Limited Times

Now you can see non-English news...

TotalEnergies in court against NGOs and local authorities who accuse it of "climate inaction"

2023-05-31T06:43:19.673Z

Highlights: A coalition of organizations believes that the oil and gas giant does not meet the conditions set by the Paris agreement signed in 2015. Under pressure, TotalEnergies meets this Wednesday climate activists at the court of Paris. Today's hearing will be one of the first opportunities to see the French group scrap against the coalition of six NGOs (Sherpa, France Nature Environnement,...) and sixteen communities (the cities of Grenoble, Bayonne or Nanterre, in particular) The judges' decision is not expected until 2024 or even 2025.


A coalition of organizations believes that the oil and gas giant does not meet the conditions set by the Paris agreement signed in 2015.


Under pressure, TotalEnergies meets this Wednesday climate activists at the court of Paris. A coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and communities, including the cities of Paris and New York (United States), is asking the courts to force the oil and gas giant to align its climate strategy with the Paris Agreement, signed in 2015.

The judges' decision is not expected until 2024 or even 2025. But today's hearing will be one of the first opportunities to see the French group scrap against the coalition of six NGOs (Sherpa, France Nature Environnement,...) and sixteen communities (the cities of Grenoble, Bayonne or Nanterre, in particular) who accuse it of "climate inaction".

Without delay, the coalition asks the pre-trial judge, a magistrate responsible for deciding questions prior to the examination of the file, to take an exceptional provisional measure: order TotalEnergies to "suspend exploration and exploitation projects for new hydrocarbon deposits that have not been the subject of a final investment decision", until the judgment of the case on the merits.

A model "incompatible with the survival of humanity"

To justify the emergency, the coalition, joined in 2022 by New York and Paris, invokes, among others, the words of the head of the United Nations: Antonio Guterres pointed out, in January, companies that promote an economic model "incompatible with the survival of humanity". The coalition also relies on the International Energy Agency (IEA), which deemed it necessary in 2021 to stop all new hydrocarbon exploration projects to comply with the Paris Agreement.

Opposite, the lawyers of TotalEnergies will plead to contest the admissibility of the legal action. This dates back to January 2020 when the coalition sued TotalEnergies for failing to comply with its "duty of vigilance" on the environmental impact of its activities. This duty has been imposed since 2017 by a pioneering French law on corporate responsibility.

For the coalition, the climate strategy of TotalEnergies, one of the twenty largest CO2 emitters in the world, is "clearly insufficient" with regard to the Paris Agreement. It hopes to obtain a French equivalent of the Shell case: in 2021, a court in the Netherlands, seized by NGOs, condemned the oil giant to accelerate its plan to reduce greenhouse gases. Shell appealed.

In another procedure conducted in France in the name of the "duty of vigilance", the NGOs that attacked TotalEnergies for its oil megaproject Tilenga-Eacop in Uganda and Tanzania, were dismissed in February by the Paris court.

Faced with pressure from public opinion, the government or even some shareholders, the CEO of TotalEnergies, Patrick Pouyanné, defended his climate strategy last Friday, during the group's general meeting. It plans to devote a third of its investments to low-carbon energy in the decade, but remains associated with oil and soon even more with gas, its priority.

Source: leparis

All life articles on 2023-05-31

You may like

Life/Entertain 2024-03-13T18:23:38.240Z

Trends 24h

Latest

© Communities 2019 - Privacy

The information on this site is from external sources that are not under our control.
The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.